Hi - I have received this result and with the negative CD value I am confused over its interpretation.
xdcd2 DADILL
Pesaran (2015) test for weak cross sectional dependence.
Unbalanced panel, test adjusted.
H0: errors are weakly cross sectional dependent.
CD=-0.133
p-value = 0.894
Also - with my dataset having many individuals (c.2500) and only 3 rounds in the panel - is autocorrelation a huge concern for analysis anyway?
Related Posts with Interpretation of result for cross sectional independence test - xtcd2
Hausman test after reghdfe with two-way clusterHello, I am a complete novice in terms of Stata and have encountered a challenge I can’t seem to ov…
Hausman test after reghdfe with two-way clusterHello, I am a complete novice in terms of Stata and have encountered a challenge I can’t seem to ov…
Advice on backtesting when an interaction is significantHi all, Currently in the works of writing my thesis where one of the regressions is the following: …
Converting Unix time to human readable time formatHi, I am having an issue converting what is assumably Unix time stamp to human readable time format.…
catplot with "empty" categoriesI'd like to plot the response percentages to a question using catplot or tabplot. However some of th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of result for cross sectional independence test - xtcd2
Post a Comment