Dear other statalist users
I've done incremental area under the curve (iAUC) calculations for glucose, c-peptide, glucagon and insulin during an oral glucose tolerance test (for both placebo and treatment). I have measurements at t=-60,0,20,40,60,90,120,180 and 240 minutes and treatment or placebo is given at -60, hence the baseline for the iAUC calculations are t=-60 min.
I followed the very helpful instructions in this thread: https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...nder-the-curve
There it was suggested to use the stata's default -integ command (cubic spline approximation) without the -trapezoidal option, since glucose and hormone curves are smooth during an oral glucose tolerance test. However, i see that many researchers within my field still use the trapezoidal method for iAUC calculation.
I was wondering whether some of you could help me deciding whether to continue with the cubic spline approximation or to stick with the "old" trapezoidal method. Specifically it would be helpful with studies comparing the trapezoidal method with the cubic spline approximation.
Best regards,
Esben
Related Posts with Cubic splines approximation vs the trapezoidal method
ARIMA goodness of fit / Auto-ARIMAHi,
1) Does STATA contain an 'auto-ARIMA' function (such as R, which uses the Hyndman-Khandakar alg…
FMM Class ProbabilitiesHello Stata experts:
I have a large dataset for which I have run a FMM model. I have realized that …
Exporting variable label with putexcelHello,
I'm exporting descriptive statistics using putexcel in Stata 14 and have been struggling to …
Fill values in a seq forwards and backwards from a valueI'm using the following fake dataset for the current problem:
Code:
* Example generated by -data…
Gsem with logit dependent variableHello everyone,
Our model is described as pic. convert is dummy variable
Code:
gsem (p1 p2 p3 &l…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Cubic splines approximation vs the trapezoidal method
Post a Comment