Dear other statalist users
I've done incremental area under the curve (iAUC) calculations for glucose, c-peptide, glucagon and insulin during an oral glucose tolerance test (for both placebo and treatment). I have measurements at t=-60,0,20,40,60,90,120,180 and 240 minutes and treatment or placebo is given at -60, hence the baseline for the iAUC calculations are t=-60 min.
I followed the very helpful instructions in this thread: https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...nder-the-curve
There it was suggested to use the stata's default -integ command (cubic spline approximation) without the -trapezoidal option, since glucose and hormone curves are smooth during an oral glucose tolerance test. However, i see that many researchers within my field still use the trapezoidal method for iAUC calculation.
I was wondering whether some of you could help me deciding whether to continue with the cubic spline approximation or to stick with the "old" trapezoidal method. Specifically it would be helpful with studies comparing the trapezoidal method with the cubic spline approximation.
Best regards,
Esben
Related Posts with Cubic splines approximation vs the trapezoidal method
Oaxaca decomposition (nledcompose): how to deal with categorical Y'sDear all, I am new to the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, and I'ld like to know your opinion about ho…
Collinearity IssuesDear All, I apologise in advance if this is a really basic question, but I am very new to stata. I…
Match Firms by SIC code (siccd) and Market Cap (marketcap)Dear all, We are trying to match a set of 1519 firms (ncusip_ipo) which IPO'd in 1975-1984, to a se…
Label variable over multiple linesI want to label multiple variables in my dataset in one command, like below: lab var /// id "ID" //…
Urgent estimation problemHello, I have 2 survey waves nad i did a probit, I saw a lot of papers include a variable loe ''wave…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Cubic splines approximation vs the trapezoidal method
Post a Comment