Dear other statalist users
I've done incremental area under the curve (iAUC) calculations for glucose, c-peptide, glucagon and insulin during an oral glucose tolerance test (for both placebo and treatment). I have measurements at t=-60,0,20,40,60,90,120,180 and 240 minutes and treatment or placebo is given at -60, hence the baseline for the iAUC calculations are t=-60 min.
I followed the very helpful instructions in this thread: https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...nder-the-curve
There it was suggested to use the stata's default -integ command (cubic spline approximation) without the -trapezoidal option, since glucose and hormone curves are smooth during an oral glucose tolerance test. However, i see that many researchers within my field still use the trapezoidal method for iAUC calculation.
I was wondering whether some of you could help me deciding whether to continue with the cubic spline approximation or to stick with the "old" trapezoidal method. Specifically it would be helpful with studies comparing the trapezoidal method with the cubic spline approximation.
Best regards,
Esben
Related Posts with Cubic splines approximation vs the trapezoidal method
GOF of Logit Model: Pearson's chi2, Hosmer and Lemeshow's testHi everyone, I am using a logit model (attached below) to investigate the impact of minority status…
Interpretation of 198% mediation effectHey everyone, I run an insignificant direkt effect of my X and Y variable but I want to test for a …
mutiple graphs in single graphHi, Does anyone knows how to make side by side bar graphs in a single graph? I did the following cod…
Stacked First-Differences Model including IV and Fixed-EffectsHello all, I have panel data on 16 countries for the years 1995 to 2007 (yearly observations). Init…
Graph bar with a grading palette of colorsHi there, I am trying to picture a bar graph. However, instead of randomly selected colours I would…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Cubic splines approximation vs the trapezoidal method
Post a Comment