Hi guys.
For my research (Master Thesis) I have two control variables on segments: one for the number of business segments and one for the number of geographic segments. Of my sample of 2318 observations, approximately 700 have missing observations for the number of geographic segments.
When I give "1" to these observations (because every firm has at least one segment) I got significant results in the direction that I expected.
Once I run the regression with the 2318-700 sample (thus the observations that do have a value on geographic segments) the coefficient decreases nearly to zero and significance is gone (t-value 0.06).
Does anyone know what I could do best here? I don't know if I can just remove a control variable because it is a control variable that is widely used in this kind of research.
FYI: I'm examining annual report' readability of US firms.
Related Posts with Significance
MergingHi I ran the following mixlogit (with 409 individuals expanded 12 = 4908 observations) mixlogit choi…
Panel data - DV continuous variable with many true zerosI am new to this forum and know only basic econometrics(self-studied). As a part of my research, I a…
Solution to the small sample size?Hi All, I have tried searching for a similar case but haven't found it yet! I need to run a regress…
Problem with distplotHi, I'm trying to plot a distribution with distplot. I'm using this command: Code: distplot var1 …
xtreg fe, drop estimated constant in stored results?Hi, I have panel data (firmid, timeid) and want a table in latex (using esttab) with two model spec…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Significance
Post a Comment