Hi Statalist
This is a question about implementing the Hausman-Taylor estimator -xthtaylor- within multiple imputation (i.e. following -mi estimate:- )
Specifically, I have completed the preceding steps in -mi- implementation
. mi set mlong
. mi register imputed ...
. mi register regular ...
. mi impute chained ...
However, when it comes to running
. mi estimate: xthtaylor [dep var] [exogenous vars] [endogenous vars], endog([endogenous vars])
The following error message appears:
mi estimate: command not supported
xthtaylor is not officially supported by mi estimate; see mi estimation for a list of Stata
estimation commands that are supported by mi estimate. You can use option cmdok to allow
estimation anyway.
My questions are:
1) Is -xthtaylor- not supported due to technical/computational reasons – in other words, is this something that a later version Stata may be able to support? Or are there theoretical reasons prohibiting the use of -xthtaylor- within -mi estimate-?
2) If the option -cmdok- is used to force an estimation, are there reasons to be sceptical of the results? (i.e. is this a recommended approach?)
Thank you very much for your help.
Related Posts with Running Hausman-Taylor estimator after multiple imputation
frget Fails when called from nested do-fileI'm getting an inexplicable error from frget that I think can only be explained by it having problem…
Variable Fails To Uniquely Identify Observations in the Using DataHi, I am using two rounds of the IHDS (Indian Human Development Survey) Individual and Household da…
using DHS DATA SETHello, I am new to stata, and making use of DHS Data set, b4__01 to b4_20 are the sex for the number…
Space in concat functionHello, I am trying to combine 10 string variables in one. I want space after each variable entry in …
event momenthi all, I have the following question regarding creating a certain event moment. in this case, I'm …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Running Hausman-Taylor estimator after multiple imputation
Post a Comment