Dear all,
I would like to pose a theoretical question. I am studying the impact of firm dynamics (let's take net entry of firms as an example) on productivity growth at regional level using panel data. I have taken account of fixed effects through LSDV and within-estimator. The first through country dummies, the second accounting for individual effects.
From a textbook point of view, with these estimators I canceled the fixed effects through de-meaning the X and the Y, on the basis of the country mean in first case or the regional mean in the second.
My question is when interpreting the coefficients, does this mean that an increase of X from the country/region mean, produce a beta effect on Y. Or, is it to be interpreted as OLS regression: an increase of X produces a beta effect on Y?
To be precise, I need to confront the peak of a curvilinear relationship of the explanatory variable, and I need to understand if the peak is an absolute value, or rather should be seen as with respect to the country/region mean?
Thanks to whom will help me.
Related Posts with Interpreting fixed effects (LSDV and within-estimator)
Nested loop to generate new variablesIs there some way I could use nested loop to recode the following, where one variable loops between …
regression line confidence intervalPlease how do i provide a 95% confidence interval for the parameters of the regression line in stata…
How can I efficiently generate many dummy variables from substrings? (other than one by one using regexm)Excuse my terrible title, I struggled to communicate what I wanted to do in a concise way. I am wor…
Modifying labels when appending datasetsI am appending datasets in which the same variable have different label values. In the example below…
"Equation not found" - Hurdle model using suestHi there, I am using Stata 15. I am trying to estimate the marginal effects for a logit-truncated n…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting fixed effects (LSDV and within-estimator)
Post a Comment