Dear all,
I would like to pose a theoretical question. I am studying the impact of firm dynamics (let's take net entry of firms as an example) on productivity growth at regional level using panel data. I have taken account of fixed effects through LSDV and within-estimator. The first through country dummies, the second accounting for individual effects.
From a textbook point of view, with these estimators I canceled the fixed effects through de-meaning the X and the Y, on the basis of the country mean in first case or the regional mean in the second.
My question is when interpreting the coefficients, does this mean that an increase of X from the country/region mean, produce a beta effect on Y. Or, is it to be interpreted as OLS regression: an increase of X produces a beta effect on Y?
To be precise, I need to confront the peak of a curvilinear relationship of the explanatory variable, and I need to understand if the peak is an absolute value, or rather should be seen as with respect to the country/region mean?
Thanks to whom will help me.
Related Posts with Interpreting fixed effects (LSDV and within-estimator)
How to store a variable's value label into a global macro?Hi stata masters, I want to store a variable's value label into a macro, and then I use this macro …
reshape monthly dataHello Everyone, I am here stuck unable to reshape a panel monthly data from US states. I extracted …
psychometric conversion scale - standard score to z-scoreI have a number of variables which are standard scores or scaled scores (language and congnitive tes…
same Chinese characters?Dear All, I have this data. Code: clear input byte A str9 B 1 "里" 2 "里" end There are two (supposed…
Calculating significance between model coefficients in different modelsIf I want to calculate if the difference between coefficients in two different models is statistical…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting fixed effects (LSDV and within-estimator)
Post a Comment