Dear all,
I would like to pose a theoretical question. I am studying the impact of firm dynamics (let's take net entry of firms as an example) on productivity growth at regional level using panel data. I have taken account of fixed effects through LSDV and within-estimator. The first through country dummies, the second accounting for individual effects.
From a textbook point of view, with these estimators I canceled the fixed effects through de-meaning the X and the Y, on the basis of the country mean in first case or the regional mean in the second.
My question is when interpreting the coefficients, does this mean that an increase of X from the country/region mean, produce a beta effect on Y. Or, is it to be interpreted as OLS regression: an increase of X produces a beta effect on Y?
To be precise, I need to confront the peak of a curvilinear relationship of the explanatory variable, and I need to understand if the peak is an absolute value, or rather should be seen as with respect to the country/region mean?
Thanks to whom will help me.
Related Posts with Interpreting fixed effects (LSDV and within-estimator)
problem with multiple if conditionsI am having issues with using multiple if conditions with replace function. I have two variables i.e…
How to transfer my string variable to date variable? Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input str10 week float …
How to add R-squared in -esttab- regression? Code: sysuse auto, clear eststo: regress price weight mpg eststo: regress price weight…
Differences-in-Differences with ModeratorsHello all, I could use some input as to how to go about a research design that I am look at doing.…
Any literature on Correlated Random Effects (CRE) with selection correction?Hello all, I am looking for the papers I can refer to regarding the selection correction in the cor…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting fixed effects (LSDV and within-estimator)
Post a Comment