Hello, I am doing an Exploratory Factor Analysis on data from a 15-item questionnaire that contains binary (yes/no) response options. To perform this analysis, I first computed a tetrachoric correlation matrix. However, I get a message that says "matrix with tetrachoric correlations is not positive definite. It has 2 negative eigenvalues." After searching online, I found that including the "posdef" command at the end of the tetrachoric command fixed the issue, and let me run the exploratory factor analysis. However, I'm wondering if any of you know what the implications are of forcing a correlation matrix to be positive definite through the "posdef" command? Thank you!
Related Posts with Implications of a not positive (semi)definite tetrachoric correlation matrix
placebo analysis: time falsification and location falsificationHi , My variable of interest is an indicator variable (LAW) that equals 1 if a firm is in a state h…
clogit or logit for a Difference-in-Difference model with fixed effectsHi everyone, I was hoping you might be able to help with this question for my thesis. I'm running a…
Missing SE in cox regression.Dear All, I am new to survival analysis using Stata and am trying to estimate a standard cox proport…
Eventdd errorHi, I am trying to estimate the eventdd technique on panel data using the code created by @Damian C…
Coefplot fit next to each otherHi, I am creating three coefficient plots with the same variables and want them to be one next to ea…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Implications of a not positive (semi)definite tetrachoric correlation matrix
Post a Comment