Quite often, I am more interested in knowing how a treatment might improve the outcomes of the untreated, rather than which effect the treatment had on the treated. However, I can only find the two procedures (estat teffects, atet) and (estat teffects, ate). My intuition would be to try (estat teffects, ate subpop(if treatmentvariable==0)), but when I tested this approach for calculating the ATET, it gave me the wrong number. The correct ATET required to write (estat teffects, atet subpop(if treatmentvariable==1)). So now I wonder whether I get the ATU by writing (estat teffects, atet subpop(if treatmentvariable==0)), or whether there is a completely different alternative way. Thank you for any advice.
Related Posts with How to calculate the Average Treatment Effect on the Untreated (ATU) vs. ATE/ATET
Analysis of rotating panel design data in StataHello everyone, I have a 9-year rotating panel design in which every year, one-ninth of the sample i…
egen newvar=group(varlist) does not generate a variable based on all unique combinations in the varlistI have been using egen newvar=group(varname1 varname2) for a while, with the understanding that newv…
Missing deciles with Portfolio SortHi, I have the following problem. When using the fastxtile command to sort my values into deciles, …
zero-inflated (poisson) mediatorsHi, I am running a mediation which the mediator is zero-inflated poisson and the outcome variable is…
Looping through multiple strings for comparisonDear all, I would like to compare educational institutions of two workers and code a binary variabl…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How to calculate the Average Treatment Effect on the Untreated (ATU) vs. ATE/ATET
Post a Comment