Greetings,
I'm running Stata 15.1 on OSX and working with cross-sectional survey data. I'm trying to test a mediation model with a binary outcome and continuous predictors. I'm thus using GSEM, which allows for non-continuous DVs. However, after exhaustively browsing this forum, I get the sense that one is very limited when it comes to assessing GOF when using GSEM. Specifically, unless I'm missing something, I appear to be limited to examining the information criterion via 'estat ic' and the path coefficients/effects via nlcom. Baseline comparison stats (CFI & TLI), the likelihood ratio stats (chi2_ms etc.), and modification indices are inaccessible with GSEM, which makes it rather difficult to determine whether my model fits the data well or needs improvement. I'm left wondering whether I'm better off treating my DV as continuous and sticking with SEM. Does anybody have any advice on how I should proceed? Thanks in advance!
Related Posts with GSEM mediation: Limitations in assessing model fit
Generalized difference in differences problemI am evaluating a government program using difference in differences. The program was implemented in…
label defineHey guys, I tried this command label define currmarr 0 "no currently legally married" 1 "currently …
Calculating Risk for Repeated Measures with Varying & Overlapping PredictorsI have data on several measures for 150 survey respondents: Infection (binary outcome of interest), …
Interpretation of terms in discontinuous growth model – mixed commandHello everyone, I am estimating a discontinuous growth curve model for a study about the impact of …
Difference in proportion adjusted for baseline characteristics (Mantel Haenszel method)Hi, I am analysing the results of a trial & would like to compare the proportion of individuals…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GSEM mediation: Limitations in assessing model fit
Post a Comment