Greetings,
I'm running Stata 15.1 on OSX and working with cross-sectional survey data. I'm trying to test a mediation model with a binary outcome and continuous predictors. I'm thus using GSEM, which allows for non-continuous DVs. However, after exhaustively browsing this forum, I get the sense that one is very limited when it comes to assessing GOF when using GSEM. Specifically, unless I'm missing something, I appear to be limited to examining the information criterion via 'estat ic' and the path coefficients/effects via nlcom. Baseline comparison stats (CFI & TLI), the likelihood ratio stats (chi2_ms etc.), and modification indices are inaccessible with GSEM, which makes it rather difficult to determine whether my model fits the data well or needs improvement. I'm left wondering whether I'm better off treating my DV as continuous and sticking with SEM. Does anybody have any advice on how I should proceed? Thanks in advance!
Related Posts with GSEM mediation: Limitations in assessing model fit
test posting results Code: Cohort | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+---------------------------------…
Bug in "tsegen"There is a bug in "tsegen" when the number of lags increase above 100. Is there any way to fix it? …
Extract date from Excel as input in global macroHi, I would like to extract a date from Excel in MM/DD/YYYY format which is located in cell B2, con…
Overlapping maps from two different coordinate datasets.I have constructed two maps of Nepal both attached below. One reflects 7 provinces while the other r…
Encoding strings stored as negative numbersHello I noticed something which puzzled me when trying to convert a variable stored partly as negat…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GSEM mediation: Limitations in assessing model fit
Post a Comment