Greetings,
I'm running Stata 15.1 on OSX and working with cross-sectional survey data. I'm trying to test a mediation model with a binary outcome and continuous predictors. I'm thus using GSEM, which allows for non-continuous DVs. However, after exhaustively browsing this forum, I get the sense that one is very limited when it comes to assessing GOF when using GSEM. Specifically, unless I'm missing something, I appear to be limited to examining the information criterion via 'estat ic' and the path coefficients/effects via nlcom. Baseline comparison stats (CFI & TLI), the likelihood ratio stats (chi2_ms etc.), and modification indices are inaccessible with GSEM, which makes it rather difficult to determine whether my model fits the data well or needs improvement. I'm left wondering whether I'm better off treating my DV as continuous and sticking with SEM. Does anybody have any advice on how I should proceed? Thanks in advance!
Related Posts with GSEM mediation: Limitations in assessing model fit
Appending Files in a Folder for Multiple FoldersHello All, I have multiple folders, each of which I would like to separately loop over and append a…
Fixed effectsDear forum, I have a urgent question. I am writing my thesis about cross-border M&A. Hence, I u…
Comparing the code of reg and reghdfe in a panel data ?I have two sets of code as below, I am wondering what are the differences between these two sets of …
Re: Converting a string variable to a date variableHello, My date variable (moyr) could not be used when I declared my dataset to be monthly panel dat…
Specific Help in Merging my Two DatasetsHello Generous people on this Forum, I am trying to merge these two databases found herehttps://dri…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GSEM mediation: Limitations in assessing model fit
Post a Comment