Dear all,
I would like to implement a version of -heckman- with too many fixed effects than my computer can compute if I include them explicity. As I've seen, Stata 16 thankfully has a dedicated command -xtheckman- for this, but unfortunately I'm scheduled to get my Upgrade to Stata 16 only in 2-3 months, while I would like to obtain some estimates now.
In principle I suppose I should be able to either estimate first the 1st stage with xtprobit and then the second stage with xtreg manually, but I am not sure how exactly to code this while ensuring that the standard errors of my second stage will be correct.
Would anyone be able to translate
xtset crossecvar timevar
xtheckman y x1 x2 x3
into a correct "manual" implementation?
Thank you so much!
PM
Related Posts with Manual implementation of -xtheckman-
2SLS With Interaction TermsHello, Sorry I've seen similar posts like this before however, I have been unable to find an answer …
Extracting string content to generate new variablesHi Statalist Wizs, I am currenrtly working with one dataset that has the following string observati…
Update to -iscogen- available from SSCAn update to the iscogen package is now available from SSC. Type Code: . ssc install iscogen, repla…
How to simulation standard deviation and confidence intervals for residual?Hello, I am trying to use simulation to verify random assignment. For instance, I want to know wheth…
Quadrature() and numerical integration in MataHi, I am estimating a Poisson log-normal count data model with maximum likelihood and I need to do …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Manual implementation of -xtheckman-
Post a Comment