Dear all,
I would like to implement a version of -heckman- with too many fixed effects than my computer can compute if I include them explicity. As I've seen, Stata 16 thankfully has a dedicated command -xtheckman- for this, but unfortunately I'm scheduled to get my Upgrade to Stata 16 only in 2-3 months, while I would like to obtain some estimates now.
In principle I suppose I should be able to either estimate first the 1st stage with xtprobit and then the second stage with xtreg manually, but I am not sure how exactly to code this while ensuring that the standard errors of my second stage will be correct.
Would anyone be able to translate
xtset crossecvar timevar
xtheckman y x1 x2 x3
into a correct "manual" implementation?
Thank you so much!
PM
Related Posts with Manual implementation of -xtheckman-
type mismatch error in htlist command of htopen package.Stata gives type mismatch error on if inlist(strvar, "abc" , "abc xyz") like condition in package - …
Factor variable and menlDear Statalist User, I am having a problem correctly defining factor variables in a nonlinear model…
Repeated time values within panel r(451)i have panel data of firms. i have merged two data sets to process data further first i tired to dec…
bootstrapping after xtregHi, I am using xtreg for a panel-data analysis and after xtreg, I need to do bootstrap. The problem …
xtabond2, Is my model valid?I am trying lots of models about system GMM with xtabond2 command. But I always think are there any …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Manual implementation of -xtheckman-
Post a Comment