Dear all,
I would like to implement a version of -heckman- with too many fixed effects than my computer can compute if I include them explicity. As I've seen, Stata 16 thankfully has a dedicated command -xtheckman- for this, but unfortunately I'm scheduled to get my Upgrade to Stata 16 only in 2-3 months, while I would like to obtain some estimates now.
In principle I suppose I should be able to either estimate first the 1st stage with xtprobit and then the second stage with xtreg manually, but I am not sure how exactly to code this while ensuring that the standard errors of my second stage will be correct.
Would anyone be able to translate
xtset crossecvar timevar
xtheckman y x1 x2 x3
into a correct "manual" implementation?
Thank you so much!
PM
Related Posts with Manual implementation of -xtheckman-
Creating panel structure - any precise way?Hello, I am trying to create a panel structure with three dimensions: exporting country, importing c…
How to choose between two possible ways to examine a relationship (Combine variables in one regression or split it into two regressions)Hi All, I have an unbalanced panel data (T=9, N=85). I want to run Fixed effect regression to exami…
CMP - Saving random effects coefficientsIs there any way to obtain estimated coefficients for random effects after estimating a system of eq…
Regression using a part of the independent variableDear Statlisters, I am currently writing my thesis and doing research on the effect of changes in t…
Problem with Panel ARDL lag selectioni am a phd student working on Oil Price Shocks and asymmetries of industrial production for which i …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Manual implementation of -xtheckman-
Post a Comment