Hello

I do a panel analysis over eight years at the provincial level, which unfortunately only gives me 192 observations. However, I think it would be better if I had done the analysis at the community level. Unfortunately, there is no data at the community level at the moment. For this reason, I would like to criticize this in my paper.

My question is, how can I argue that my research with community level data would be better. This would also give me a much larger dataset for the eight years. Unfortunately, I can't find any literature on this. Do you know where I can find literature on this, or perhaps in the Wooldridge book on which page this is explained, why an investigation with a larger dataset would be better and what advantages would result from a larger dataset?

Thank you very much for your help.