Hi Statalisters,
I am using Ben Jann's excellent "oaxaca" command. I have a question regarding interpretation; I hope this is not outside the bounds of this forum. I am running a detailed decomposition. Both the explained and unexplained components are significant. Within the explained component, several of the variables are significant. However, within the unexplained component, none of the variables are significant. What is the correct interpretation of an unexplained component that is significant in general, but which has no significant betas within it?
Thank you,
Robbie
Related Posts with Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
Can asdoc output be exported as HTML?I would like to export asdoc (from SSC) or asdocx output as a HTML table? I searched the help files,…
RECODE helpI have a variable that states the name of the assurance provider called NewNumVerifiers. Originally,…
xi: areg and aregHi! I am running regressions involving patient fixed effects and year fixed effects. I am not quite…
Interpreting the coefficients of continuous variables that add up to 1.Hi All, I have several variables that are probability distributions and add up to 1 for each observ…
Type of RegressionHi, I want to model a regression for which the dependent variable is bounded from 0 to 1 (normally d…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
Post a Comment