Hi Statalisters,
I am using Ben Jann's excellent "oaxaca" command. I have a question regarding interpretation; I hope this is not outside the bounds of this forum. I am running a detailed decomposition. Both the explained and unexplained components are significant. Within the explained component, several of the variables are significant. However, within the unexplained component, none of the variables are significant. What is the correct interpretation of an unexplained component that is significant in general, but which has no significant betas within it?
Thank you,
Robbie
Related Posts with Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
how to generate the median variable by industry every 3 years?Hello everyone: I am trying to get the median of the sales growth rate for all the companies within…
Tab2xl issuesHello everyone, I've just come across tab2xl and have been trying to include it in a loop to get a …
Descriptive statistics if command error r(198)Hi everyone, I am trying to create a descriptive statistics table of my data but only for the cases…
delimiters not recognized by stata when importing txtDear statalist, I have a txt file which I would like to import in stata. The delimiter I use is "§"…
Generating new variable which estimates the mean of a group of identifiersDear all, I am currently working with a dataset which contains the following variables: id (industr…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
Post a Comment