Hi Statalisters,
I am using Ben Jann's excellent "oaxaca" command. I have a question regarding interpretation; I hope this is not outside the bounds of this forum. I am running a detailed decomposition. Both the explained and unexplained components are significant. Within the explained component, several of the variables are significant. However, within the unexplained component, none of the variables are significant. What is the correct interpretation of an unexplained component that is significant in general, but which has no significant betas within it?
Thank you,
Robbie
Related Posts with Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
reproducible reports from stata to lyxis there a command to reproduce or copy tables from stata into LYX (lyx is platform for latex)? …
Generalized Diff-in-Diff with different treatment startsHello, I am new to statalist but I used the forum previously to find help which I did. However, I c…
A question about SVY data propoetionGood day everybody. I am trying to calculate the proportion of one of the survey variables, over a …
Testing for selection biasHello everyone, I was wondering if anyone knows how to test for differences in characteristics for …
Procedure to estimate effects with repeated binary outcomes after propensity scoreHello. I'm using Stata 15.1. I have a dataset of 88 observations in the treatment group, and need t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
Post a Comment