Hi Statalisters,
I am using Ben Jann's excellent "oaxaca" command. I have a question regarding interpretation; I hope this is not outside the bounds of this forum. I am running a detailed decomposition. Both the explained and unexplained components are significant. Within the explained component, several of the variables are significant. However, within the unexplained component, none of the variables are significant. What is the correct interpretation of an unexplained component that is significant in general, but which has no significant betas within it?
Thank you,
Robbie
Related Posts with Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
OR, IRR and multivariate analysisDear Listers I am working with a dataset much like the one you see here. Code: * Example generate…
Can I make a bivariate histogram for two indicator variables?Let's say I have two dummy variables like this. Code: set obs 100 gen A=runiformint(0,1) gen B=run…
bar graph from matrix with CI as error barsHi all, I am trying to figure out how to make bar graph out of a matrix. I know there have been many…
New version of wridit on SSCThanks as always to Kit Baum, a new version of the wridit package is now available for download from…
spatial econometricsHi everyone Someone knows how to run the LMlambda, LMlambda ROBUST LMrho LMrho ROBUST ? What is co…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Unexplained component in oaxaca decomposition
Post a Comment