Dear Community,
In a RCT design with 2 groups (control group n=18 ; and Exercise Training group n=17) that were tested at baseline and at 2 months, I would like to know if:
1/ the proportion of participant reporting some symptoms such as "muscle pain" is significantly decreasing after the 2-month follow up in each group.
2/ if there is a significant difference on the proportion change between the group
For the question 1/, I am not sure if the Mc Nemar's test is the test I have to use
For the question 2/, I have no idea about the variable and the test that I can use
I give you here an exemple :
control group n=18 ; and Exercise Training group n=17.
In the control group : 11 participants are reporting muscle pain at baseline while they were 8 at the end of the study.
In the exercise training group : 11 participants are reporting muscle pain at baseline while they were 6 at the end of the study.
thank you for your precious insight
Merci
F
Related Posts with McNemar's chi2 test for proportion
Stata forecast does not support mixed effects modelsAs part of reviewer's requests/recommendations, I am trying to compare forecast accuracy of the (alm…
Problem with bysort command as it is always showing not sorted!Dear Stata Members I would like to calculate the industry sales growth (isg) and following is my sam…
Endogeneity and RESET Test with PPMLHello, I'm trying to estimate trade potential for the BRICS group of countries - as in, intra-BRICS…
propensity score matchingI want to do a 1:2 propensity score matching. I am unable to find a source for this any help? …
set data out of range as missingDear statalist, I have a variable, index, its value should be between 0 to 1, but there are some va…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to McNemar's chi2 test for proportion
Post a Comment