Hi everyone,
I am trying to estimate a double hurdle model: Probit and lognormal (Craggs model), I would like to address the issue of endogeneity with one of my independent variables. I have seen some studies use an IV and others use a control function approach. The issue is my variable of interest appears only in the lognormal portion of the double hurdle. Would conventional IV approaches suffice by regressing my independent variable of interest in a first-stage regression with the IV and other controls and using the predicted values in my double hurdle model?
Related Posts with Endogeneity in double hurdle models
stata evenstudy2 packageI use stata SE 14.2 version to do event study analysis. I'm using eventstudy2 package, but always so…
Creating a dynamic portfolio of returnsDear Statalist members, I am using Stata for the first time for my Masters Thesis and have tried to…
loop over unique values to create a sequence of consecutive numbersHi every one, I am going to loop over unique value of a date series (date1) to create a series of nu…
SADI: Sequence too longI am using SADI to do OMA. My data have 4 obervations with 3313 varialbes. When I do: oma V1-V3313, …
Within-between estimator with a lagged dependent variableHey, I have some CSTS data. I wish to use the "within-between" random effects estimator (Bell and J…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Endogeneity in double hurdle models
Post a Comment