I have read a few threads regarding this topic (e.g. https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...uous-variables) but have not yet found an answer to my question. Apologies if the identical question has already been answered.
I have a count dependent variable (Y) (linear TWFE results are shown, but marginal effects from Poisson are virtually identical), which I have regressed on two continuous variables (X1 and X2) and their interaction.
The summary statistics of the variables are:
Code:
Variable | Obs Mean Std. dev. Min Max -------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Y | 373,763 .1933016 2.363418 0 502 X1 | 373,763 .5695304 .6594848 0 4.364 X2 | 373,763 -2246.553 773.906 -3651.53 316.896
Code:
HDFE Linear regression Number of obs = 373,763 Absorbing 3 HDFE groups F( 141, 7317) = 1955.95 Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity Prob > F = 0.0000 R-squared = 0.0578 Adj R-squared = 0.0292 Within R-sq. = 0.0016 Number of clusters (token1) = 7,318 Root MSE = 2.3286 (Std. err. adjusted for 7,318 clusters in ID) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Robust Y | Coefficient std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval] ---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- X1 | -.5015123 .1355351 -3.70 0.000 -.7672003 -.2358244 | c.X1#c.X2 | -.0002419 .0000586 -4.13 0.000 -.0003567 -.000127 //The coefficient on X2 alone is perfectly collinear with the fixed-effects
For instance, one often compares the magntiude of the coefficient on a dummy variable to the mean of the dependent variable to assess economic significance, and whether the effect is large enough to be "interesting". Similarly, what would one compare the coefficient on c.X1#c.X2 to in order to assess its magnitude?
Please let me know if my question is unclear, I would happy to rephrase it.
0 Response to Interpretation Magnitude Interaction Two Continuous Variables Economic Significance
Post a Comment