Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience using multiple imputation with a two-stage IPD-MA model?
I am having difficulty incorporating the the *mi estimate* command with ipdmetan syntax so that it analyses the pooled mi data, rather than the multiple copies. In my ipdmetan syntax, I understand that I need to use the mi estimate prefix to specify use of mi data. Whilst *mi estimate* works with ': estimation command . . .' (regress) this results in analysis of the multiplied data points rather than the pooled mi data. When I add 'mi estimate: ipdmetan' to the first part of the syntax I get an error message (subcommand is unrecognized).
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Kind regards,
Kristina
Related Posts with Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Loop with spaces and quotesHello, I have a list of terms that have spaces and quotes that I want to loop over. I have been abl…
SAS date to Statahi, i am working with a SAS data set and birthday variable reads as , list BIRTHY in 1/10 +------…
Looking to add ifxed effects for a model but unsure how to go about it.Hi, I am doing a project where I am looking at state incarceration rates for the year 2016. I am loo…
Logit with CI chartIs there a Code: lfitci or Code: qfitci type command to chart a logistic regression with confi…
create a variable for the second lowest valueI have a list of values (bids). I already have generated the minimum value via: Code: egen minbid…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Post a Comment