Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience using multiple imputation with a two-stage IPD-MA model?
I am having difficulty incorporating the the *mi estimate* command with ipdmetan syntax so that it analyses the pooled mi data, rather than the multiple copies. In my ipdmetan syntax, I understand that I need to use the mi estimate prefix to specify use of mi data. Whilst *mi estimate* works with ': estimation command . . .' (regress) this results in analysis of the multiplied data points rather than the pooled mi data. When I add 'mi estimate: ipdmetan' to the first part of the syntax I get an error message (subcommand is unrecognized).
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Kind regards,
Kristina
Related Posts with Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
How to 1+1=1, 1+0=1, 0+1=0, 0+0=0?hi I'd like to make a selfxthrift variable as shown below. 1+1=1, 1+0=1, 0+1=0, 0+0=0? What should I…
Variable name and variable label are not shown after the execution of "putexcel" commandMy data Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int i…
Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?I am using SEM to run some multiple regressions to take advantage of MLMV/FIML. All of my models hav…
forvalues or foreach loop in one line of codeI am trying to convert some long lists of values in Excel and I basically need to create a long list…
ppml_panel_sg Command is not workingIf i put two or three variables ppml_panel_sg command is working but i put more then 5 variables it …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Post a Comment