Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience using multiple imputation with a two-stage IPD-MA model?
I am having difficulty incorporating the the *mi estimate* command with ipdmetan syntax so that it analyses the pooled mi data, rather than the multiple copies. In my ipdmetan syntax, I understand that I need to use the mi estimate prefix to specify use of mi data. Whilst *mi estimate* works with ': estimation command . . .' (regress) this results in analysis of the multiplied data points rather than the pooled mi data. When I add 'mi estimate: ipdmetan' to the first part of the syntax I get an error message (subcommand is unrecognized).
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Kind regards,
Kristina
Related Posts with Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Mediation suregDear all, I am running the follwing STATA code from the example from this website: https://stats.id…
Years are dropped when running a fixed effect regressionDear all, For my thesis, for which I have gathered panel data, I have to run a logit regression wit…
Pesaran TestHi guys, I am running a fixed effects regression and wanted to test for cross-sectional dependence. …
Help needed: Creating a panel data set with individuals within countriesHello, I am trying to create a panel data set, for individuals within European countries over the t…
OLS Regression with lagsHey! I am writing my bachelor thesis, studying the relationship between monetary policy and housing…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Post a Comment