Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience using multiple imputation with a two-stage IPD-MA model?
I am having difficulty incorporating the the *mi estimate* command with ipdmetan syntax so that it analyses the pooled mi data, rather than the multiple copies. In my ipdmetan syntax, I understand that I need to use the mi estimate prefix to specify use of mi data. Whilst *mi estimate* works with ': estimation command . . .' (regress) this results in analysis of the multiplied data points rather than the pooled mi data. When I add 'mi estimate: ipdmetan' to the first part of the syntax I get an error message (subcommand is unrecognized).
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Kind regards,
Kristina
Related Posts with Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Quantify the effect size of an interaction termHello, I have a doubt that it is not specific about Stata. However, I would like to ask you for an…
Transpose and CollapseGood Morning Stata Members, Below is an example of my data structure: SchoolCode,CourseCode, V1, …
table / collect - odd behaviourI am trying to construct a simple table following a paired -test to show the mean difference, p valu…
Matching: Conditioning on lagged dependent variablesHi everybody, I wondered whether it does make sense to condition on the lagged dependent variable w…
Power Analysis [power] in Context of Regression Analysis and Robust Standard ErrorsHi, Based on the results of a regression analysis, I would like to perform a power analysis that ac…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Post a Comment