Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience using multiple imputation with a two-stage IPD-MA model?
I am having difficulty incorporating the the *mi estimate* command with ipdmetan syntax so that it analyses the pooled mi data, rather than the multiple copies. In my ipdmetan syntax, I understand that I need to use the mi estimate prefix to specify use of mi data. Whilst *mi estimate* works with ': estimation command . . .' (regress) this results in analysis of the multiplied data points rather than the pooled mi data. When I add 'mi estimate: ipdmetan' to the first part of the syntax I get an error message (subcommand is unrecognized).
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Kind regards,
Kristina
0 Response to Using mi data in two-stage IPD-MA
Post a Comment