Hello and Greetings from India!
For my current study on analysis of market share of insurance companies, using the one step system GMM, I have made use of xtabond2 command and the output is appended below. Kindly help me to interpret the following:
a) Whether the postestimation AR1 AR2 is OK, what is the null hypothesis for the same
b) How to interpret the Sargan and Hansen tests here, I think my instruments are collpased properly so whether the post estimation is in line with it
c) How to interpret the - Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets
The model output is as follows:
xtabond2 L(0/2)l_mktshr l_reinsuti l_roa l_diversif l_finlvg l_liq, gmm (l_reinsuti l_roa l_diversif, lag (2 5) collapse) iv (l_finlvg, eq(diff)) iv (l_liq, eq (level)) robust
Favoring space over speed. To switch, type or click on mata: mata set matafavor speed, perm.
Dynamic panel-data estimation, one-step system GMM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group variable: compid Number of obs = 236
Time variable : year Number of groups = 24
Number of instruments = 18 Obs per group: min = 1
Wald chi2(7) = 2066.17 avg = 9.83
Prob > chi2 = 0.000 max = 14
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
l_mktshr | Coefficient std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
l_mktshr |
L1. | .9721295 .0986449 9.85 0.000 .778789 1.16547
L2. | -.1141199 .0459984 -2.48 0.013 -.2042751 -.0239647
|
l_reinsuti | .2576628 .1368833 1.88 0.060 -.0106235 .5259491
l_roa | .2412237 .3302044 0.73 0.465 -.4059651 .8884125
l_diversif | -.0068372 .1239378 -0.06 0.956 -.2497508 .2360765
l_finlvg | -.1238919 .0537652 -2.30 0.021 -.2292697 -.0185141
l_liq | .0212269 .0618168 0.34 0.731 -.0999318 .1423855
_cons | -1.485467 1.475171 -1.01 0.314 -4.376748 1.405814
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instruments for first differences equation
Standard
D.l_finlvg
GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed)
L(2/5).(l_reinsuti l_roa l_diversif) collapsed
Instruments for levels equation
Standard
l_liq
_cons
GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed)
DL.(l_reinsuti l_roa l_diversif) collapsed
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -2.62 Pr > z = 0.009
Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = 0.51 Pr > z = 0.612
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(10) = 21.44 Prob > chi2 = 0.018
(Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)
Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(10) = 12.79 Prob > chi2 = 0.236
(Robust, but weakened by many instruments.)
Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets:
GMM instruments for levels
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(7) = 7.49 Prob > chi2 = 0.380
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(3) = 5.29 Prob > chi2 = 0.151
iv(l_finlvg, eq(diff))
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(9) = 12.63 Prob > chi2 = 0.180
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(1) = 0.16 Prob > chi2 = 0.689
iv(l_liq, eq(level))
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(9) = 6.94 Prob > chi2 = 0.644
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(1) = 5.85 Prob > chi2 = 0.016
Related Posts with Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets:
Using Stata with Shared Cloud Apps: OneDrive or DropboxHello, I have been running into issues with using Stata with shared folders in OneDrive. With my u…
Question regarding interpretation of interaction effect in logistic regressionHello, I was wondering if it would be possible to get some feedback on my interpretation of interac…
How to Categorize float variableI want to Categorize float variable which has letters as its elements. Elements: Horse, Camel, Car,…
Difference in Difference omitted treatment indicatorHello! I want to analyse how a market entry of a specific app is associated with a change in the dow…
Stata equivalent to SPSSHello friends I hope you are well. I saw this video on youtube on how to normalize your data on SPS…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets:
Post a Comment