Hi everyone¡
I have cluster data from a School District ( 2000 Workers nested in 25 Schools), I have a continuous dependent variable and an independent variable, and several dichotomous covariates (at the individual and group level)
I am running Mixed in Stata 16. The null model's ICC is low (0.036), but the LR test vs. linear model suggests that the two-level model offers a significantly better fit to the data than the single-level model. Adding the first group level variable (variable at the School level) works the same...meaning that ICC is low. Still, the LR test vs. linear model suggests that the two-level model offers a significantly better fit to the data than the single-level model. When adding most group-level variables the ICC looks very odds (I suppose extremely low: 7.03e-16 ) and the LR test vs. linear model suggests that the two-level model does not offer a significantly better fit to the data than the single-level. My questions:
-How should I interpret an ICC value of: 7.03e-16
-Should I use standard regression and skip clustering the data?
Thanks, ¡¡¡
Related Posts with Problem with intraclass correlation coefficient in Mixed-effects
Using SEM for estimation of a RI-CLPMI am trying to estimate a random intercept cross lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), as recommended by Ham…
Collapse command, OLS regression, and weighing per groupHello everyone, I am analyzing a large dataset with STATA, and am utilizing OLS regression to try t…
switch_probitHello Statalist, I am trying to use switch_probit for an endogenous switching model. I once used it…
Move selected observations one variable/column to the rightHello. Please consider my data: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dat…
Creating new variable from other variablesHello; I am trying to merge some variables to create a new variable. To expand, I am trying to cre…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problem with intraclass correlation coefficient in Mixed-effects
Post a Comment