Hi everyone¡
I have cluster data from a School District ( 2000 Workers nested in 25 Schools), I have a continuous dependent variable and an independent variable, and several dichotomous covariates (at the individual and group level)
I am running Mixed in Stata 16. The null model's ICC is low (0.036), but the LR test vs. linear model suggests that the two-level model offers a significantly better fit to the data than the single-level model. Adding the first group level variable (variable at the School level) works the same...meaning that ICC is low. Still, the LR test vs. linear model suggests that the two-level model offers a significantly better fit to the data than the single-level model. When adding most group-level variables the ICC looks very odds (I suppose extremely low: 7.03e-16 ) and the LR test vs. linear model suggests that the two-level model does not offer a significantly better fit to the data than the single-level. My questions:
-How should I interpret an ICC value of: 7.03e-16
-Should I use standard regression and skip clustering the data?
Thanks, ¡¡¡
Related Posts with Problem with intraclass correlation coefficient in Mixed-effects
Stset with durationsStset with durations. hello i have wide format data with different dates which i used to create diff…
Summing over a value of variable for repeating countyHello respected stata community, I have a dummy variable which takes the value 0 and 1. The observa…
Question: Bayesian Vector Autoregression (BVAR)Hello everyone, is there any code to summarise and or combine results from BVAR model? For instance.…
Split population durationHello, I'm trying to make a Split population duration with the spsurv command but I can't understand…
Merge accuracy using str format when most contain only numbersDear stata user, I have a question regarding the merge accuracy of str. I have dataset A whose firm_…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problem with intraclass correlation coefficient in Mixed-effects
Post a Comment