I have an outcome variable with three categories, and I noticed that when I run a multinomial logistic regression Stata shows slightly different results than when I run two binary logistic regressions. Specifically, when I compare outcome "1" and outcome "2" to base outcome "0" using mlogit, I get slightly different results than when I compare outcome "1" with outcome "0" and outcome "2" with outcome "0" in two separate binary logistic regression models (using the logit command).
Why is that?
My understanding is that both approaches should get me the same results, since both approaches compare outcomes "1" and "2" to baseline outcome "0".
Related Posts with Why does Stata show different results when I use -mlogit- versus -logit-?
No observations - Portfolio SortsHello everyone, I have double-sorted my data and dropped observations to include only one observati…
Reminder: 25th UK Stata Conference (London, 5-6 September 2019): Submissions before 31 May 2019 pleaseDates: Thursday 5 September and Friday 6 September 2019 Venue: Cass Business School Executive Educat…
Insufficient observations when running panel dataHello all, I have a question I am trying to run a linear probability model with the following comman…
lassologit: Stata package for logistic lasso regressionFollowing up on lassopack, Chris Hansen, Mark Schaffer and myself have developed a package for logis…
do-file does not even runRecently I am working on the paper of Ehrmann et al. (2011). For replication I need to run their do-…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Why does Stata show different results when I use -mlogit- versus -logit-?
Post a Comment