A squared term is negative and statistically significant, suggesting an inverted-U relationship as hypothesized, but the graph for the predicted probability of the variable indicates a linear relationship. What does it mean and what should I do?
Related Posts with A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
If and only if operatorHi Statalist, Random question: why isn't there an if and only if operator in STATA? I very often wa…
mnPS command to use twang with stata for multiple treatmentsI'd like to estimate propensity scores for multiple treatments and try to use the mnps command in St…
Generating mean variable by subgroupDear all, Im currently working with a panel datatset covering automation risk on occupational- and …
Stratified sample using one stratum.Hi! I am doing a study about schools in different municipalities and are trying to do a stratified s…
Antedependence Model_ lagged-response modelDear honourable members, Please, I am dealing with unbalanced panel data with unequal spacing in ti…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
Post a Comment