A squared term is negative and statistically significant, suggesting an inverted-U relationship as hypothesized, but the graph for the predicted probability of the variable indicates a linear relationship. What does it mean and what should I do?
Related Posts with A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
Winsorization in Cross Sectional Data Setup* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int stock_id str52 stock…
Lagged dependent variable, fixed effects, and IVHello everyone, I have concerns for several days about the validity of the results I obtain with my…
25 Portfolio Returns series by Dependent Double Sort - ASTILE* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int stock_id str52 stock…
question about panel data managementHi, I have a panel dataset. In the dataset, a variable ‘father’s school’ was surveyed once at firs…
inrange including negative valuesHi all, I am attempting to create a dummy variable within stata for modeately negative real interst…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
Post a Comment