A squared term is negative and statistically significant, suggesting an inverted-U relationship as hypothesized, but the graph for the predicted probability of the variable indicates a linear relationship. What does it mean and what should I do?
Related Posts with A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
command "strupper" is unrecognisedHi all, I don't know why it happens when I wrote: strupper ("hallo") the error: command strupper is …
Omitted dummy variables due to collinearity, but missing values should prevent them entering the modelDear Statalisters, I am using Stata SE 17 on Windows 10. I'm conducting a panel data analysis with t…
Need help with nested logit marginal effectsDear scholars, I am having problem estimating the marginal effects after the estimation of my nested…
Change axis label specifications twoway graphHello, I am tyring to group values if the follwing changes of the y-axis label would be possible: -…
Speed comparison: Passing data vector by name vs pointers in Mata | StataI was experimenting with different uses of pointers. Turns out that in a larger dataset, pointer mig…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
Post a Comment