A squared term is negative and statistically significant, suggesting an inverted-U relationship as hypothesized, but the graph for the predicted probability of the variable indicates a linear relationship. What does it mean and what should I do?
Related Posts with A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
Village fixed effects using logit for PSMHello everyone, I want to run a logit using village fixed effects then use it with propensity score…
Accessing the coefficient estimate in a threshold regressionHi, I need your help. When we run a simple regression, we may access the coefficient by typing Cod…
Including additional interaction fixed effects wHi Statalist, I just joined the community and I would like to ask a question that I couldn’t solve …
Syntax error on "or" commandDear Madam/Sir, I am new to STATA programming. After searching several posts, I make the following …
Formatting Data in STATA.Good Afternoon, I am an Economics student and I am using STATA for a group project where we are anal…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to A squared term is negative and significant but the graph is not.
Post a Comment