Hi Statalist,
I would like to seek help for a problem I encountered. I tried to estimate a regression where I regress outcome variable IHS on factor variable Chinese_event (I chose 7 as the base period) and Stata did use 7 as the base period. However, when I tried to add an interaction between the factor variable Chinese_event and a continuous variable std_repub_share, I also specified 7 as the base period, Stata did not omit period 7. I have tried to use io7.Chinese_event. It still did not work. Please see the output below. what should I do? I appreciate any suggestions!
reg IHS ib7.Chinese_event ib7.Chinese_event#c.std_repub_share
Related Posts with Stata overrides the command for which level to omit in a regression
Generate primary, secondary, tertiary employer each month in panel dataHi everybody I am working with panel data to test how employees are affected when they are insource…
L'option Orthogonal dans le GMM en système two-stepJ'évalue l'effet de la qualité des institutions (DIM_POL) sur le développement financier (DFI). Pour…
Village fixed effects entered as continuous due to otherwise uncomputable AMEs (collinear)Dear Statalist community, I am analyzing the demand determinants of 3 insurance products in a poole…
Collect Prefix Command and Ttest resultsHi all, In Stata 17 I've been trying to work with the collect command to produce some Latex tables!…
Adjusting for correlations in regressionHi everyone, I ran two economics experiments and I am having trouble making the correct inference. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Stata overrides the command for which level to omit in a regression
Post a Comment