Does anyone know the assumptions that need to be met to use spxtregress, fe? In looking through the manual (https://www.stata.com/manuals/sp.pdf), I see that residuals should be i.i.d. (i.e., no heteroskedasticity). But I don't see anything about normality. Do residuals also need to be approximately normal? And are there any other assumptions that need to be met?
Related Posts with Residual assumptions for spxtregress, fe
effect sizes and multilevel modelsHi all, I am running the below mixed effects model. Code: mixed outcome indeps || _all: R.rater…
Saving multiple simulated data using foreach commandDear all, I am a newbie in a simulation study. Here I created one simulated data using foreach comm…
How to assess quality of PSMATCH2 matching result in matching within strata?Dear Statalist users, I have been digging previous posts regarding my problem and do not seem to fi…
Matching two datasetsHi, I have one dataset with 33 observations where I have three geographical variables: state which…
Translating ice to mi impute and a not positive definite VCEHi all I'm trying to update some imputation code that currently is written using ice to mi impute (…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Residual assumptions for spxtregress, fe
Post a Comment