Hi
I am using a partial proportional odds model (ordered) because the Brandt test showed that it violated the parallel lines assumption. However, I am having a hard time interpreting the output and writing the results section for a journal article. Would appreciate some assistance. For example, what does the following line mean?
- there are three categories of employment status so does "imposed" mean "not significant"?
- self efficacy not imposed so I can report that it does increase the likelihood of DV ie. a good sign?
Testing parallel lines assumption using the .01 level of significance...
Step 1: Constraints for parallel lines imposed for 2.Employment_Status (P Value = 0.9292)
(Note: there are 3 categories of employment status)
Step 41: Constraints for parallel lines are not imposed for
1.SelfEfficacy (P Value = 0.00122)
Wald test of parallel lines assumption for the final model:
( 1) [1]1.Employment_Status - [2]1.Employment_Status = 0
chi2( 40) = 37.58
Prob > chi2 = 0.5799
Financial_distress_~l | Coefficient Std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]
Employment_Status |
SelfEmployed | .1760828 .0916741 1.92 0.055 -.0035951 .3557607
PT | .0907362 .0753507 1.20 0.229 -.0569486 .2384209
Are there any articles showing how to report findings? My field typically reports B, SE and Exp(B) for Logistic regression methods so I am feeling lost. Thank you.
Related Posts with Interpreting results using gologit2 and autofit features for Partial Proportional Odds Model
Visualizing on different conditionsHi all, I am trying to plot a scatter diagram based on different conditions but it does not work. …
how to use Stata 17 to output a table of panel fixed effects regression?Dear Statalist, I am using Stata 17 to run panel fixed effects regression.I want to use the command…
Issue with an -estadd- to display fixed effectsI would like to display two fixed effects at the end of each column: "FE(i): yes" and "FE(y): yes". …
Panal data regression with vce robustHi, I'm want run a regression analysis on panel data from a time period 1997-2015. I ran the follow…
McNemar's test after Propensity Score Matching?Dear all, Apologies I am asking a very basic question as I am having trouble with it. For instance …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting results using gologit2 and autofit features for Partial Proportional Odds Model
Post a Comment