Dear All,
Due to some problem of convergence with melogit, i am thinking of using meqrlogit instead. I was able to compare the results of an estimation run with both of them and the point estimates are identical. However the standard errors are not. With melogit i can use clustered standard errors, while it seems to me that there is not the possibility of using robust standard errors with meqrlogit. Am i correct?
If I use meqrlogit, is the following statistical inference correct? I am afraid that without applying robust standard errors, my inference could be questionable.
thanks for your suggestions.
Dario
Related Posts with melogit vs meqrlogit
Get words from a list if they contain a given substringI have a set of filenames in a list like Code: local files "a.dat b.dat c.dat d.xlsx e.dat f.xlsx"…
Difference in Difference SignificanceHi all, I'm trying to figure out whether there has been a change in the ratio of liquid assets to t…
Fixed effects in -xtpcse-Hello everyone, I'm running an analysis with TSCS data and test statistics reveal the presence of a…
Unified preference configuration file across nodes on unix systemI'm using Stata 16 MP GUI with a network license on RHEL. I am connected to that system using MobaXt…
Diff-in-diff and parallel trend assumptionThis question is not strictly related to Stata, I will remove if it is inappropriate. In a diff-in-…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to melogit vs meqrlogit
Post a Comment