Hello to all.
we are looking at possibilities for further analysis of knowledge of Family planning (FP) methods which stands at >97% in a certain population. my quick thoughts are that probably no need for further analysis as the knowledge is universal. we just keep it descriptive. Otherwise we end up with perfect prediction for many zeros in certain categories. What are your thoughts on this? Any technique for further analysis you can think of?
Related Posts with analysing categorical data with very high of outcome of interest
How to calculate MSE and MAPE via the do-file or commands?So this is my question: Array …
Survey weights in Canadian Community Health Survey Public-Use Microfiles.Hi Forum, This is a bit of a Hail Mary, but Statistics Canada literally recommended that I ask you …
Saving multiple file names in one .txt or .dat Dear all, I would like to run Monte Carlo simulation in Mplus using 100 data generated from Stata. …
Changing date format in Stata graphsHello, I have daily data from jan 2004 to sep 2017 and I want to have on the x-axis the dates showi…
Best way to write "input files" at top of .do file (macros?)I am interested in listing all of my "input" and "output" files early in my code so that the list is…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to analysing categorical data with very high of outcome of interest
Post a Comment