Dear statalist,
I have a dataset from a trial where subjects were allocated to either standard of care (SOC) or to experimental treatment (ET). However, some of the subjects (20%) who were randomized to receive ET ended up receiving SOC. This switch was due to a continuous variable x and a binary categorical variable y. The outcome variable is a continuous variable. How do I adjust the treatment effect (ATE, ATET, which needs to be expressed as a mean difference with 95% CI) to arrive at a causal inference? Which would be the best method to choose: ivregress, ivtreatreg, eteffects or etregress? Is there any other better method that I need to look into?
Related Posts with Adjusting treatment effect for crossover type of non adherence in a two arm trial
Merging m:m - it seems to work for me. Why critise? Appreciate your feedbackAs you can see in my previous posts. I currently have one huge dataset called procedure. This shows…
Generate Unique Group ID in a Panel Data with Spelling VariationsDear Statalist users, I have created a panel dataset based on election results (this is a fairly lar…
I would like to turn my imperfect edgelist into a perfect one (with all possible pairs of nodes of a network)Hi everyone. To put it very briefly, I have data on different individuals and their connections with…
Independent Variable predicts is highly correlated with dependent variable.I will be very grateful for your help on this issue. Independent Variable (Last Birth CS) is highly …
Need help with surveysetI have a study using HCUP National Inpatient Sample. My commands were all working until I got to hos…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Adjusting treatment effect for crossover type of non adherence in a two arm trial
Post a Comment