Dear statalist,
I have a dataset from a trial where subjects were allocated to either standard of care (SOC) or to experimental treatment (ET). However, some of the subjects (20%) who were randomized to receive ET ended up receiving SOC. This switch was due to a continuous variable x and a binary categorical variable y. The outcome variable is a continuous variable. How do I adjust the treatment effect (ATE, ATET, which needs to be expressed as a mean difference with 95% CI) to arrive at a causal inference? Which would be the best method to choose: ivregress, ivtreatreg, eteffects or etregress? Is there any other better method that I need to look into?
Related Posts with Adjusting treatment effect for crossover type of non adherence in a two arm trial
standard errors when using Lubotsky-Wittenberg methodology for proxy combinationI am trying to compute the standard errors of an estimate obtained using the Lubotsky-Wittenberg (20…
Finding the estimated variance of residualsHello, I am fairly new to Stata and I have a question which I hope can be answered via this forum. …
Multiple imputation STATA commandBelow is the command I am using to calculate the AUC for my prediction models in imputed datasets. I…
DIFF command results interpretationI ran a difference-in-differences model using the command DIFF (Villa, 2016) in Stata/IC 15.1 on a s…
twoway graphs with different yaxisHello I am trying to do a graph with two different yaxis. The problem is that the difference between…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Adjusting treatment effect for crossover type of non adherence in a two arm trial
Post a Comment