It appears that risk ratio (comparing p/(p+q) for each group) is preferred to odds ratio (using p/q for each group) in some medical journals. The <meta esize> command asks for numbers corresponding to p & q. If I enter p & (p+q) instead, it will calculate the ln RR but are there consequences I've not noticed?
Related Posts with Risk ratio meta analysis - naive question
Making box plots more visibleHello I'm a stata newbie with several questions which I will be posting subsequently in this forum …
master dofile won't run through, despite the dofiles referred to do (if run manually)Hi guys. I wonder if somebody has experienced the following: A master dofile referring to several d…
Code: Add Variable with Ideal lower and higher numerical values in Panel datasetHello, Could any one of your please help me with coding to add a new variable to the existing datas…
lpoly estimates for panel dataHello, I want to use the lpoly command to smoothen the outcome variable in a panel. The question i…
gan- Hansen Test Result: coefficients are exactly identifiedDear All, While running the diagnostic command for my dynamic panel data analysis, the sargan-hanse…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Risk ratio meta analysis - naive question
Post a Comment