It appears that risk ratio (comparing p/(p+q) for each group) is preferred to odds ratio (using p/q for each group) in some medical journals. The <meta esize> command asks for numbers corresponding to p & q. If I enter p & (p+q) instead, it will calculate the ln RR but are there consequences I've not noticed?
Related Posts with Risk ratio meta analysis - naive question
Help! Standard deviation interpret?How much would Expenditure have to increase, holding Percent constant, to increase SAT by one standa…
Dialog box: how to force waiting for user's input?Dear Stata list, I have a do-file that first collects username and password via dialog box, then pr…
Coefplot matrix with transform option when the matrix contains missing valuesHello everyone, I am always being helped a lot from past threads, but this time I need to start a n…
basic question on coefplot subgraphsDear all, I have a basic question on coefplot. I would like to plot two subgraphs and apply heading…
Graph with laddersHello! I have data on employment by sector by country. When I group variables, sorting by year and …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Risk ratio meta analysis - naive question
Post a Comment