It appears that risk ratio (comparing p/(p+q) for each group) is preferred to odds ratio (using p/q for each group) in some medical journals. The <meta esize> command asks for numbers corresponding to p & q. If I enter p & (p+q) instead, it will calculate the ln RR but are there consequences I've not noticed?
Related Posts with Risk ratio meta analysis - naive question
forvalues and xtile.Hello! I have a dataset with income and expense throughout several years (1992, 1994, ... 2016) I wa…
Job Posting for Biostatistician at Cancer Support CommunityEXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Cancer Support Community’s Research & Training Institute (RTI) in Philadel…
Collinearity problem in Difference in DifferenceI am trying to evaluate a government program where poor schools were selected and given money to imp…
teffects loops, inconsistent covariate coverage, and perfect predictorsHello, I am stumped on a coding problem. I am measuring the treatment effect on each of multiple out…
PSM/Probit: 7 successes completely determined.Hi, I am doing propensity score matching and use the command psmatch2 in Stata 15.1. Below the tabl…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Risk ratio meta analysis - naive question
Post a Comment