This regression measures the impact of the log change in competition (measured in # competitior banks) on the difference in average bank-level outcomes (in this case change in loans). The paper states (looking at Column 1, marked in yellow) that "a 1-standard-deviation increase in the growth in the average number of LICUs within a 5-mile radius of a bank after the letter is associated with about a 0.16 percentage point, or 0.04 standard deviation, decline in average lending growth."
How did the author come to the 0.16 pp decline? why is it not a 0.567 percentage point decline? Array
Related Posts with Interpreting the coefficients using "one standard deviation"
table issue againHey there, Having solved my last issue leads me directly to the next one.. My goal is to reshape th…
Adding too many variables to a regression modelAm I correct in thinking adding too many variables to a regression model can increase the likelihood…
Reshape long then wide: use variable labels as new variable's (j) values, and with missing valuesHi All, I'm trying to reshape a dataset, and I'm having two problems that I can't solve. What I'm …
too many variables, tabulateHi there, I have some troubles with the command tabulate. My Goal is to create a table in Stata, ju…
Conditioning on wide variablesHello, I created a wide dataset where 'm201509' to 'm201512' are binary variables indicating that t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting the coefficients using "one standard deviation"
Post a Comment