Hi
I find it odd that when I run my fixed effect regression only few variables are significant, but when I then run the quantile fixed effect regression (almost) everything is highly significant - also those variables that in the fixed effect were insignificant.
Have anyone experienced this before or have any potential explanation?
Many thanks in advance.
Related Posts with Fixed effect vs quantile fixed effect - different results
Marker symbols and line patterns not showing in legend (combomarginsplot)Greetings, I'm running Stata 15.1 on OSX. I'm trying (struggling) to graph the predicted margins fr…
Multiple testing cox proportional hazards modelHi everyone, I'm running a cox proportional hazards model and testing multiple exposures. Instead o…
generating variables by using foreach commandI would like to rename variables "a_tick6 a_Cf1 a_Cf21 a_Cf2" into "tick6 Cf1 Cf21 Cf2" (Namely, I w…
Building a fraction variable cumulativelyDear all users of Statalist, I have a question about how to build a variable of cumulative fraction…
How to make STATA estimate different coefficients in the same regression model using different sample sizes?Hi All, I am running a regression model in STATA. The regression equation is as following: y=a+b1*…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effect vs quantile fixed effect - different results
Post a Comment