Dear everyone,
I have a doubt with respect to the need of first differencing the variables cointaining unit root before estimating a model using System GMM with xtabond2.
According to the Im-Pesaran-Shin test results (xtunitroot ips), some of the variables in the model I want to estimate are I(1) and some others are stationary. There is also another potential regressor, population density, which is I(2).
Would it be correct to include the I(2) variable first differenced twice, the I(1) variables in first differences and the stationary ones in levels?
Or since GMM uses the first differences it is not necessary to compute the first differences for the I(1) variables? Therefore to include the I(0) and the I(1) variables in levels (and only to first difference once the I(2) variables if included)(?)
If it is informative, I must say that the panel dimensions are N=170 and T=21, so a quite long time dimension. I use the collapse option of xtabond2 in order to minimize the proliferation of instruments.
Thank you very much for any comment and help.
Laura
Related Posts with Proper treatment of the variables that have unit root when System GMM is used
‘Or’ condition for time dummiesHi, I have a question about time dummies. Is it possible to have an ‘or’ condition for a time dummy…
Multinomial probit (mprobit): Syntax for specifying constraintsColleagues: The model being estimated is Code: mprobit y i.(x1 x2 x3 x4 x5) LHS variable y has 5 …
different yline/subtitle in a by() plotHi all! I have a complicated graph that I have multiples of for different categories and would like…
Synth control method not matchingArray Hello, I have completed making a synthetic control method model of Russia after the interven…
loopsHi, I am trying to look at a range of numbers in a loop but am having difficulty. My data looks li…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Proper treatment of the variables that have unit root when System GMM is used
Post a Comment