Dear everyone,
I have a doubt with respect to the need of first differencing the variables cointaining unit root before estimating a model using System GMM with xtabond2.
According to the Im-Pesaran-Shin test results (xtunitroot ips), some of the variables in the model I want to estimate are I(1) and some others are stationary. There is also another potential regressor, population density, which is I(2).
Would it be correct to include the I(2) variable first differenced twice, the I(1) variables in first differences and the stationary ones in levels?
Or since GMM uses the first differences it is not necessary to compute the first differences for the I(1) variables? Therefore to include the I(0) and the I(1) variables in levels (and only to first difference once the I(2) variables if included)(?)
If it is informative, I must say that the panel dimensions are N=170 and T=21, so a quite long time dimension. I use the collapse option of xtabond2 in order to minimize the proliferation of instruments.
Thank you very much for any comment and help.
Laura
Related Posts with Proper treatment of the variables that have unit root when System GMM is used
Predicting DV by keeping covariates at mean+-SD and visualisationDear Statalists, This is my very first post on the forum. Here goes my problem: I want to generate…
Coefplot dropping first interaction w/ reghdfeDear colleagues, Using coefplot after running reghdfe, interaction terms are being dropped. For ex…
Creating a dummy variableHi there, I have a date variable formatted as 1980m1 etc. I want to create a dummy variable which is…
Lasso inference - forcing lasso to accept groups of variables togetherI am interested in running lasso inference models (starting with dsregress), but I have non-trivial …
Frequency detection problemI have data about doctors and their patients. Every doctor has an ID. And one doctor could treat sev…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Proper treatment of the variables that have unit root when System GMM is used
Post a Comment