Dear Statalisters:
There are a million threads on Statalist already for similar topics (e.g., https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...ter-xtlogit-fe), so many that I experienced decision paralysis about which one to bump and decided to start a new one.
The issues that have been raised in the past is that because xtlogit, fe doesn't estimate the fixed effects it's impossible to know what the actual marginal effect would be. Have there been any advances in figuring out how to calculate population-level predicted probabilities over a given categorical variable (e.g., by race/ethnicity, gender, etc) or over a continuous variable (e.g., year, age, height, etc)? I want to dig into this a little bit more but if someone has figured it out--or come up with new reasons why it doesn't work with the conditional logit estimator--I'd like to know.
Thank you for your time.
Related Posts with predicted probabilities using xtlogit, fe: The state of the art?
Help in Fama McBeth regressionHi, I'm working on fund performance persistence. I want to run a Fama McBeth regression using marke…
Pie graph with missing values in spmapHi all, I wonder if its possible get a graph pie in blank if exist missing value in the data, examp…
Generating years from interval (for dummy variable purposes)Array I've a data set as show above. The cikcode represents individual companies and i have the sta…
Please help in codingDear all, I tried to code ethnic group but have difficulty. Survey question-What is your ethnicity?,…
RESET testHi, How can I run the RESET test for a gravity model with pair-fixed effects?: ppmlhdfe TRADE RTA …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to predicted probabilities using xtlogit, fe: The state of the art?
Post a Comment