Hey everyone,
I was just wondering how to interpret my interaction terms in my regression analysis. They are theoretically motivated and significant at the p<0.01 level. However, they do not improve the fitness of the model (r2). Is this a problem? How can one understand this when they are significant? Is it unwise to include them?
All the best
Related Posts with Significant interaction term but no increase in r2
Separating by group in a scatterI would like to plot the mean wage with confidence standard deviations by grade and race (black v wh…
How to calculate weighted mean incomeI want to calculate a weighted mean income for each state. Here is a part of the sample. (I randoml…
Generate cases according to a number in variableDear All, How do we create a number of cases according to the number in a variable. For example I w…
How to extract matrix elements to Word table using putdocx table?I have a matrix called matrix1 whose values are present and verified (e.g., using matrix list matrix…
How should I test significance between 2 groups?I have two groups. I want to measure whether group difference is significant or not. For example, in…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Significant interaction term but no increase in r2
Post a Comment