Hey everyone,
I was just wondering how to interpret my interaction terms in my regression analysis. They are theoretically motivated and significant at the p<0.01 level. However, they do not improve the fitness of the model (r2). Is this a problem? How can one understand this when they are significant? Is it unwise to include them?
All the best
Related Posts with Significant interaction term but no increase in r2
Methodological question: xtabond2Hello, Please I am looking to apply the xtabond2 command to my panel data. However, I have unequall…
Combining graphsI am attempting to combine 2 graphs together. Here's my code: eststo: reg varlogwageinc i.agegrp9…
ML with interval constraintDear All, This is my very first post on Satatlist. If anything is inappropriate, please let me know…
Margins in logitHey, I am doing an analysis in stata and i am a bit confused. I have this logit regression: Dealcom…
Structural break - testing dependent variable onlyHi all, I am undertaking a structural break test for my regression mode, but was informed that I sh…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Significant interaction term but no increase in r2
Post a Comment