Hey everyone,
I was just wondering how to interpret my interaction terms in my regression analysis. They are theoretically motivated and significant at the p<0.01 level. However, they do not improve the fitness of the model (r2). Is this a problem? How can one understand this when they are significant? Is it unwise to include them?
All the best
Related Posts with Significant interaction term but no increase in r2
PML model or analysisplease i need help how to perform PLM model in stata? …
How to split lines into separate ones?Dear all, My data has about 200,000 observations and it has two distinct ids (Rank and NCTId), Date…
Interpreting marginal effect of gologit2 using mfxHi all, I'm running a generalised ordered logit regression using the gologit2 command and then usin…
PDF documentation don't show up in STATA 16 using Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTSI just installed STATA 16 in my Ubuntu machine and everything is running well. However, when I need …
Small issue in installing -rcall-Hi stateliest, I'm trying to install a package named "rcall", but has a small issue with that. I'm u…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Significant interaction term but no increase in r2
Post a Comment