Hello everybody,
I am a completely new user of STATA. I want to estimate the effects of pandemic prevention policy on international trade. ExWork1 is the extent of workplacement closure policies in exporting countries while ImStay1 is stay-at-home requirements in importing countries. These two variables lie in a unit interval [0, 1].
. ppmlhdfe Exportvalue ExWork1 ImStay1 , absorb(imp Month exp) cluster(imp#exp)
> nolog
warning: dependent variable takes very low values after standardizing (2.4417e-
> 08)
Converged in 8 iterations and 18 HDFE sub-iterations (tol = 1.0e-08)
HDFE PPML regression No. of obs = 6,864
Absorbing 3 HDFE groups Residual df = 571
Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity Wald chi2(2) = 14.37
Deviance = 2.63668e+11 Prob > chi2 = 0.0008
Log pseudolikelihood = -1.31834e+11 Pseudo R2 = 0.9423
Number of clusters (imp#exp)= 572
(Std. Err. adjusted for 572 clusters in imp#exp)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
Exportvalue | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
ExWork1 | -.1307411 .0367221 -3.56 0.000 -.2027152 -.0587671
ImStay1 | -.0447394 .0262254 -1.71 0.088 -.0961402 .0066614
_cons | 21.09845 .058649 359.74 0.000 20.9835 21.2134
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Absorbed degrees of freedom:
-----------------------------------------------------+
Absorbed FE | Categories - Redundant = Num. Coefs |
-------------+---------------------------------------|
imp | 44 0 44 |
Month | 12 1 11 |
exp | 13 1 12 ?|
-----------------------------------------------------+
? = number of redundant parameters may be higher
Could anyone plese tell me can I use this result in my undergraduate dissertation? This result shows that the workplacement closure policies in exporting countries are negative with bilateral trade and stay-at-home requirements don't have any siginificant results. My supervisor didn't give me any idea so I don't know whether this result is feasible.
Does "Prob > chi2 = 0.0008" mean this result is not useful? How about value of 'z'? Why are they negative and what's the influence of them?
Thanks very much!
Related Posts with (PPMLhdfe) Question about the feasibility of the results
Updated combomarginsplotGreetings, An updated combomarginsplot is now available on SSC (thanks Kit Baum!). This version has…
How to sum up (frequency and percentage) by group?Hello, I have a dataset like below. What I want to do is to group based on icd_code (first 3 digit…
Graph box over sex, side by side boxesHi folks, Apologies if this question is simple but I was trying to find a good solution. I want to…
two notes when using twoway graph, by()Hi all, I'm making a graph (see below) that uses the twoway graph by() option. As you can see, beca…
Using stata to choose between tobit and double hurdle modelsHi Dear users of statalist forum, I am working on double hurdle model to specify factors affecting a…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to (PPMLhdfe) Question about the feasibility of the results
Post a Comment