Hello everybody,
I am a completely new user of STATA. I want to estimate the effects of pandemic prevention policy on international trade. ExWork1 is the extent of workplacement closure policies in exporting countries while ImStay1 is stay-at-home requirements in importing countries. These two variables lie in a unit interval [0, 1].
. ppmlhdfe Exportvalue ExWork1 ImStay1 , absorb(imp Month exp) cluster(imp#exp)
> nolog
warning: dependent variable takes very low values after standardizing (2.4417e-
> 08)
Converged in 8 iterations and 18 HDFE sub-iterations (tol = 1.0e-08)
HDFE PPML regression No. of obs = 6,864
Absorbing 3 HDFE groups Residual df = 571
Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity Wald chi2(2) = 14.37
Deviance = 2.63668e+11 Prob > chi2 = 0.0008
Log pseudolikelihood = -1.31834e+11 Pseudo R2 = 0.9423
Number of clusters (imp#exp)= 572
(Std. Err. adjusted for 572 clusters in imp#exp)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
Exportvalue | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
ExWork1 | -.1307411 .0367221 -3.56 0.000 -.2027152 -.0587671
ImStay1 | -.0447394 .0262254 -1.71 0.088 -.0961402 .0066614
_cons | 21.09845 .058649 359.74 0.000 20.9835 21.2134
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Absorbed degrees of freedom:
-----------------------------------------------------+
Absorbed FE | Categories - Redundant = Num. Coefs |
-------------+---------------------------------------|
imp | 44 0 44 |
Month | 12 1 11 |
exp | 13 1 12 ?|
-----------------------------------------------------+
? = number of redundant parameters may be higher
Could anyone plese tell me can I use this result in my undergraduate dissertation? This result shows that the workplacement closure policies in exporting countries are negative with bilateral trade and stay-at-home requirements don't have any siginificant results. My supervisor didn't give me any idea so I don't know whether this result is feasible.
Does "Prob > chi2 = 0.0008" mean this result is not useful? How about value of 'z'? Why are they negative and what's the influence of them?
Thanks very much!
Related Posts with (PPMLhdfe) Question about the feasibility of the results
How to generate the highest education Level at wave X, given the data from all previous survey waves?Dear All, I am working with longitudial survey and my dataset contains a data from the 7th Survey w…
Remove blank space at the end of a graphHi Statalist! I am trying to get a plot of multiple time-series in one graph but I keep getting thi…
How to count observation number (and percentage) based on var1 by var2?Hi,all, Description of my data set: Var 1 is education, with values indicate levels of education. V…
Converting a start and end date (a timeframe) into several annual time dummiesHi, I have observations with a start date and an end date (e.g. 04/31/1997 and 02/19/2002) and I wan…
Saving mean and CI after "svy: mean" or a more efficient way to plot survey trends with CI's?Hello Statalist, I'm new to using the -svy- commands and I am trying to construct trend graphs with…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to (PPMLhdfe) Question about the feasibility of the results
Post a Comment