I have done a heckprobit regression on a cross section data. My main explanatory variable is a district level variable (logtuiexp). Is it possible to additionally use district level dummies in the regression to control for unobserved heterogeneities? I had done so. However, two district dummies are getting dropped. I am getting some results though.
Here is my code
heckprobit govt male rural logtuiexp i.dist logfeediff mpce [pweight=Multiplier_combined], select(curattend = male rural i.dist logtuiexp logfeediff mpce bpl) vce(cluster dist)
note: logtuiexp omitted because of collinearity
note: logfeediff omitted because of collinearity
note: 459.dist omitted because of collinearity
note: logfeediff omitted because of collinearity
Depending on the way I enter i.dist in the regression, my results are changing. If I end it after all other district level variables, stata is unable to identify.
Any guidance would be extremely help me to proceed with my work.
Thanks in advance
Sayoree Gooptu
PhD Research Scholar
Related Posts with Heckprobit regression with dummy variables
svylogitgofHi! I am absolutely new to STATA and I hope that you could help me to solve this issue. I run a lo…
flat log likelihood encountered, cannot find uphill directionI am working with a time series data, i try to forecast next day volatility with EGARCH (1,1) I got …
Bootstrapping versus robust VCE option in xtpoission to deal with overdispersionHi everyone, Does the bootstrapping option in xtpoission deal with overdispersion, or is vce(robust…
runiform(a,b) function for a stataSE 12Hi Everyone, I am trying to create a random element that its value is between A and B. therefore I …
Interpreting log-log results with first differenceI have data that explores the relationship between Port activity (TEU) and industrial real estate va…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckprobit regression with dummy variables
Post a Comment