Hello everyone,
I ran the following regression :
xi: areg Y X1 X2 X1_X2 $x i.year, absorb(firm_id) cluster(firm_id)
estimates store reg1
both X1 and X2 are dummy variables (equal either 1 or 0), with year and firm fixed effect and SE clustered on firm level.
my question is how to interpret the results of this regression ?
I ran a wald t test as follow to test whether B1+B3 was statistically different from zero.
test X1+X1_X2==0
my research question would be what's the effect of X1 on Y when X2=1.
am I doing it correctly or is there a better way to interpret the interaction term coefficient?
Thank you
Related Posts with testing the economic significance of an interaction term of two categorical variables
Multiple imputation with panel dataHello everyone, I have a panel dataset with daily data on covid-19 outcomes at country level and ot…
Dummy based on other dummy variable (PANEL DATA)Hi, Stata. I want to create the wanted dummy to equal 1 if scaledummy is equal 1 in 3 continuous ye…
Margins interaction variables Beta regressionDear Statalisters, I am running a regression with proportions as dependent variable. In the beta re…
Changing the color of kdensity line on top of histogramI ran the following code to draw kdensity line on top of histogram. But it gives me a green color an…
Generating a dummy for a measurement change in one independent variableDear Statalist, I am currently writing my dissertation and have encountered some difficulties that …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to testing the economic significance of an interaction term of two categorical variables
Post a Comment