Dear statalist users,
I have a question about the bsample command in STATA. I want to use this command to obtain the optimism-corrected performance estimates (R squared and adjusted R squared) for a prediction model using linear regression. I plan to calculate this as:
Optimism= (adj) R squared_bootstrapped - (adj) R squared_ original sample
Optimism corrected values of (adj) R squared= original sample (adj) R squared value minus optimism
To this end, I first ran the linear regressions in the original sample (using the ‘regress’ command) to obtain the ‘(adj) R squared_ original sample’ and then used the bsample command where after I ran the same linear regressions to obtain the ‘(adj) R squared_bootstrapped’.
Could someone indicate whether this is the correct approach?
And should the bootstrapped R squared value always be lower than the original value? Or can it either be higher or lower and you just take the difference to calculate the optimism (so that the optimism-corrected value is always lower than the original value)?
Thank you in advance your you help!
Related Posts with Correct for optimism in prediction modelling using bootstrapping (bsample command), is this the correct approach?
Add text to figure?Hi everyone: I'm trying to add a couple of text labels to my figure, which shows two normal distribu…
Interpretation the footer of xtdpdsys command in GMM regressionHi all Statalists, I have used xtdpdsys command to run my model and receive this below result. Can a…
Any idea about courses?Hi everyone, Does anyone have an idea about nice PhD level course in advanced STATA or basic R? ver…
3200 conformability error using spm packageclear all set more off ssc install spwmatrix ssc install spm net install spm, from(http://www.econom…
Categorizing values within a single variable via loopGood evening, I am new to Stata and have been researching and consulting the help command on a prob…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Correct for optimism in prediction modelling using bootstrapping (bsample command), is this the correct approach?
Post a Comment