Dear statalist users,
I have a question about the bsample command in STATA. I want to use this command to obtain the optimism-corrected performance estimates (R squared and adjusted R squared) for a prediction model using linear regression. I plan to calculate this as:
Optimism= (adj) R squared_bootstrapped - (adj) R squared_ original sample
Optimism corrected values of (adj) R squared= original sample (adj) R squared value minus optimism
To this end, I first ran the linear regressions in the original sample (using the ‘regress’ command) to obtain the ‘(adj) R squared_ original sample’ and then used the bsample command where after I ran the same linear regressions to obtain the ‘(adj) R squared_bootstrapped’.
Could someone indicate whether this is the correct approach?
And should the bootstrapped R squared value always be lower than the original value? Or can it either be higher or lower and you just take the difference to calculate the optimism (so that the optimism-corrected value is always lower than the original value)?
Thank you in advance your you help!
Related Posts with Correct for optimism in prediction modelling using bootstrapping (bsample command), is this the correct approach?
OLOGIT Odds Regression doesn't include all the values for variable.Hello all, I attach screenshots below of two OLS regressions. The first one worked with no issues. …
Exact Same ICC for Two LevelsI am estimating a three-level model: Persons in PSUs in Countries with melogit. My code is below. Th…
Recoding/Generating variables with conditionsHello! I want to recode my education variables which has values ranging from 1-21 referring to diffe…
Problems with running fuzzy RDDear stata users: I have two questions related to running fuzzy rd in stata and hope someone can hel…
Dfl (1996)Dear STATA users, I am trying to understand the computational aspect of DFL (1996) counterfactual d…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Correct for optimism in prediction modelling using bootstrapping (bsample command), is this the correct approach?
Post a Comment