How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
It may be noted that in the case of ordered probit, one gets a set of numbers as marginals as there is multiple ordered category of the dependent variable. Binomial also may have values between 0 and N. Is the default marginal computed by STATA for binomial regression (say with atmeans) is true for the average or expected value of the dependent variable as well as all independent variables. For example, if Y is our dependent variable, and X is an independent variable and the marginal of X is given as 0.12, can I conclude that one unit increase of X at its mean will lead to 0.12 units of increase in E(Y)?
Related Posts with How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
The modulus -mod()- function is giving me negative values. Is this a bug?The help for the modulus function, -mod()- reads: mod(x,y) Description: the modulus of x with respe…
How to estimate a monthly treatment effect in fixed effect panel data model ?Dear statalist, I am trying to estimate a fixed-effect model to evaluate the effect of program inte…
Apply numerical IDs for multiple dataHello, I was wondering whether anyone can help me- as I am very new to Stata. I have multiple pati…
Problem importing SAS formatsI'm trying to import SAS formats for CDC's Youth Risk Behavior Survey. I have the SAS data set file …
Fixed Effects regression with clustering - QuestionHello, I'd like to utilize year and industry fixed effects regression and calculate t-statistics us…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
Post a Comment