How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
It may be noted that in the case of ordered probit, one gets a set of numbers as marginals as there is multiple ordered category of the dependent variable. Binomial also may have values between 0 and N. Is the default marginal computed by STATA for binomial regression (say with atmeans) is true for the average or expected value of the dependent variable as well as all independent variables. For example, if Y is our dependent variable, and X is an independent variable and the marginal of X is given as 0.12, can I conclude that one unit increase of X at its mean will lead to 0.12 units of increase in E(Y)?
Related Posts with How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
Two sample unpaired ttest with mean difference specifiedI need to run a t-test on a two sample group that is unpaired with unequal variance for a specific m…
Can I use logit without with YES/NO data instead of 0/1?Hi, everyone, All my data are in YES/NO values instead of 0/1. And I want to find the correlation a…
Question regarding Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for weighed dataI am using sample weighted data. I want to compare a result before and after an intervention. I woul…
Proper titles for outreg2 output tableDear Stata users, I am trying to export summary statistics using outreg2 function with the followin…
How do I visualize the relationship between a continuous and a ordinal variable?Hi, I would like to create a scatterplot including a linear regression line. The x-axis should be o…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
Post a Comment