How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
It may be noted that in the case of ordered probit, one gets a set of numbers as marginals as there is multiple ordered category of the dependent variable. Binomial also may have values between 0 and N. Is the default marginal computed by STATA for binomial regression (say with atmeans) is true for the average or expected value of the dependent variable as well as all independent variables. For example, if Y is our dependent variable, and X is an independent variable and the marginal of X is given as 0.12, can I conclude that one unit increase of X at its mean will lead to 0.12 units of increase in E(Y)?
Related Posts with How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
Calculating changes in a variable over irregular intervals when a condition is met in grouped dataI've been calculating changes in GDP in countries for adjacent quarters (gen ch_gdp =gdp_quart-gdp_q…
Estimate GARCH Model from Time SeriesHallo, I am a student and new to Stata. For a university course I have to model a GARCH model from …
Birth CohortsHi statalist! I would like to make birth cohorts (5 years gap and above 25 years old adult). I have…
One-sided t test regressionHello everyone, I don't have much experience with STATA and I'm working on my master's thesis. I wo…
How to create dummy variable with condition that it needs to have 3 observation in 5 years?I have a question how to create a dummy variable with certain conditions. I know how to create a dum…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?
Post a Comment