Data: cross section Firm level data
Countries 40
Industries 25
Dependent Variables Y1 Y2 Y3 (Binary)
Indp Variable Firm Level
Import (Continous)
Importer (binary 0,1)
Instruments (Continuous Variables)
IV1 (No empirical evidence I found on IV1 as instrument variable), IV2 (Reported in past studies)
ivprobit Y (import=IV1) Controls i.industry i.country, vce(cluster country/Industey)
This model suggest that replacing Y with Y1 Y2 Y3 and clustering on country except for Y3 where Wald test is significant at 10% , Y1 Y2 are significant at less than 5%.However clustering on industry, Wald test is insignificant for Y1 and Y2 and Y3 are significant at <5%.
IV2 (Reported in past studies)
ivprobit Y (import=IV2) Controls i.industry i.country, vce(cluster country/Industey)
Clustering on country, Wald test for Y1 is insignificant while Y2 and Y3 are significant, however, clustering on industry then except for Y3 both Y1 and Y2 are insignificant.
Q1-My Question is what are the decision criteria for clustering on Country or Industry. Can I keep the results from clustering on country because it’s much better than clustering on industry?
Q2- I don’t have empirical evidence on IV1 but in my case results are much better than IV2 which is reported in previous studies, should I report both of them? if so then how should I explain this contradiction of both IVs?
Q3- Remember I have another endogenous regressor “importer” which is also Binary (0,1) and outcome Y is also binary,” biprobit seemingly unrelated equation” is it the correct approach, while instruments are continous?
biprobit (Y=importer controls i.industry i.country) (importer=IV1/IV2 Controls i.industry i.country)
Or maybe I should use
ivregress 2sls Y (import=IV1/IV2) controls i.industry i.country (cluster country) first
Which ignores the binary nature of outcome,
Guide please……….sorry for this long post because I wanted to make clear the situation wht I have……….THANKS IN ADVANCE
Related Posts with Cluster? Using biprobit (seemingly unrelated equation) correct approach if both outcome and endogenous regressor are binary?
Heckman Two-Step ModelHi, I am trying to estimate the effect of having a female director on board on earnings management. …
How to use marginsplot in lagged dependent variable modelsIt seems that Stata margins command does allow to include a lagged DV as a control. In the following…
Threshold regression for balanced/unbalanced panel dataHello all, My current project aims to test whether gdp growth rate varies with different regimes of…
Problem with xtivreg2: variable not found, but created.Hi! I am trying to run the loop below but it returns error r(111) lt3m_qe not found . However, this…
Population Census Data: Variable Preparation for PCA with sample weightsHello all, I am new to the Stata Community and working on the 2016 Canadian census of population mi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Cluster? Using biprobit (seemingly unrelated equation) correct approach if both outcome and endogenous regressor are binary?
Post a Comment