I am looking at the health gap between indigenous and non-indigenous Canadians and am unsure on how to specify and interpret dummy variables. 2 categorical variables I include are occupation status (employed, unemployed, stay at home, retired) and income group (0-$19,999, $20,000-$39,999, $40,000-$59,999, $60,000-$79,999, $80,000 or more). I see these options:
A) oaxaca healthindex occ_* inc_* [aw=weight], by(indigenousstatus) relax
OR
B) oaxaca healthindex normalize(occ_*) normalize(inc_*) [aw=weight], by(indigenousstatus) relax
So my questions are:
1) Should I normalize these variables?
2) How do I interpret the endowments/explained coefficients for these dummies with or without normalize?
My idea would be, if for example the occ_employed coefficient is .1248:
- A) The health gap would decrease by 0.1248 if indigenous people had the same ratio of employed people as compared to the reference category as non-indigenous people.
- B) The health gap would decrease by 0.1248 if indigenous people had the same rate of employment as non-indigenous people.
Does that sound correct?
Thank you very much!!
Related Posts with Interpreting (normalized) dummies in explained component oaxaca-blinder
IRF in a SVAR with manually modified B matrixHello, I'm estimating a SVAR with both government spending and tax rates, as well as GDP, similar t…
Categorize income variable due to quartilesHello, I assume the solution is very simple, but I'm just standing at a loss.... I have to categro…
not enough memory for "merge"Dear community! I am trying two merge two files based on a facilityID which, however, is a unique i…
How to save the predicted value of regressionsDear Statalists' Can any one help me how to save the predicted value of many regressions. I have to …
Common trend assumption in DiDHi all, I am currently working on a project where I try to investigate competition in online traffi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting (normalized) dummies in explained component oaxaca-blinder
Post a Comment