Hello,
I tried to get a 95%-CI for Cramers V I calculated using the tabulate-command. I used bootstrapping, the CI got calculated but it entailed negative values which are not possibe for V. So my questions are:
1. Why does Stata calculate negative values for the CI of V? Might there be something wrong with my data?
2. Is there another way to calculate the CI for V besides bootstrapping?
Thanks in advance
Laura
Related Posts with 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
ppmlhdfedear all I tried to use ppmlhdfe I used ppmlhdfe variable variable vairalbe .. ,absorb(im#ex, im#y…
Extracting Specific String Elements of a String VariableHello All, I would like to extract certain specified string components of a string variable so that…
Hausman test: Differenced variance matrix's rank not equal the number of coefficientsDear Listers, I'm currently working with an unbalanced panel of 9000 individuals over a 10 years pe…
carryforwardhi statalist-- i am having issues with the carryfoward package. hoping someone will be able to help…
Test for a structural break with an unknown break date / postestimation cannot continue due to collinear variablesHi all, I am running the sbsingle command to test for a structural break with unknown break date. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
Post a Comment