Hello,
I tried to get a 95%-CI for Cramers V I calculated using the tabulate-command. I used bootstrapping, the CI got calculated but it entailed negative values which are not possibe for V. So my questions are:
1. Why does Stata calculate negative values for the CI of V? Might there be something wrong with my data?
2. Is there another way to calculate the CI for V besides bootstrapping?
Thanks in advance
Laura
Related Posts with 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
How to run conditional indirect difference test with categorical moderator in Stata 14.2Hello everyone! Can someone please help me to run the conditional indirect difference test with cat…
Performing survival analysis under GSEMBefore I go to my questions, I'll give a short background of my research proposal. Most longitudinal…
Plot count data with SE bars on StataHi, I am looking at code for making a chart where I could plot two variables--- eg: no of times vis…
How to run conditional indirect difference test in Stata 14.2Hello all, I am having difficulty to run conditional indirect difference test in Stata 14.2. Here i…
Principal component analysis in panel data settingHello to everyone, I have a panel of 190 industries over the 2000-2018 period. my data-set contains…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
Post a Comment