Hello,
I tried to get a 95%-CI for Cramers V I calculated using the tabulate-command. I used bootstrapping, the CI got calculated but it entailed negative values which are not possibe for V. So my questions are:
1. Why does Stata calculate negative values for the CI of V? Might there be something wrong with my data?
2. Is there another way to calculate the CI for V besides bootstrapping?
Thanks in advance
Laura
Related Posts with 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
-putpdf- with -tempfile-Dear All, I am puzzled why the putpdf command requires the output file name to have specifically th…
long format data, creating a new variable (loop)Dear Statalist, I have data in long format with observation year: 2000 to 2019, n=125 000. I have a …
Maximum length of arguments passed to Stata in batch modeI'm calling Stata from PowerShell and want to pass some arguments for the do file to be run. The com…
fixed effects and and vce(robust) in poisson regressionHello everyone, I am aware that this is more of a statistical quuestino than a question on Stata but…
Format regression coefficients using file writeI am outputting non-standard tables to TeX and using file write following this example: https://gith…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
Post a Comment