Hello,
I tried to get a 95%-CI for Cramers V I calculated using the tabulate-command. I used bootstrapping, the CI got calculated but it entailed negative values which are not possibe for V. So my questions are:
1. Why does Stata calculate negative values for the CI of V? Might there be something wrong with my data?
2. Is there another way to calculate the CI for V besides bootstrapping?
Thanks in advance
Laura
Related Posts with 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
Looping too many variablesI did the following for too many variables: Variable 1: Code: bysort year Industry: egen Industry_…
Expand spell data into a panel with specific reoccuring observation datesDear Statalisters, I have an administrative dataset that is updated on the 1st and 15th day of ever…
Remove space from file nameHello all, I am working with a bunch of excel files and wish to re-save them without any spaces in …
SUR vs GMM, 3SLS vs GMMHello, I'm trying to understand how GMM works and noticed that GMM produces the same estimates as O…
Add line to sts graph (kaplan meier)Im having trouble with overlaying two graphs. I have 3208 observations for my survival graph (curv…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to 95% BCa confidence interval for Cramers V with negative values - why?
Post a Comment