Dear Statalist Users,
I am trying to figure out which method is more appropriate for my research: heckpoisson or a zero inflated negative binomial regression.
I am looking at the innovation output of startups measured as patent applications per year, depending on the type of parent company (all startups are spin-offs).
In my sample of 160 firms, 55 have not applied for any patents at all. Hence, a zero inflated negative binomial regression seems appropriate I guess.
However, one of the independent variables I wanted to look at is "Patent Overlap", a binary variable that equals 1 if the startup and its parent company have patents in the same field, 0 if not. This variable obviously equals 0 if a startup did not apply for any patents at all. One of my colleagues pointed out that because of this a sample selection bias is present and he recommended using a heckman model.
I am unsure what is the right choice here. Any advice?
(I am happy to attach a dataex if that helps)
Best wishes,
Tom
Related Posts with Heckpoisson or Zero Inflated Negative Binomial?
the regression constant in oglmHow do I get the regression constant in oglm? …
CounterHi all, I have the following dataset: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc ins…
Tobit regression generating predicted values above the censored limit.Hi all ! I am running the tobit model on stata 14.1 with the following command: tobit effscr lnta_…
Confusion about when to use SUR estimation (sureg) or Multivariate regression (mvreg)I am having a problem deciding between seemingly unrelated regression (sureg) and multivariate regre…
How is this construct `=function(argument)', `=scalar_name', `=scalar_value' etc. called, and where can I read more about it?Nick Cox is putting to good use a construct which has same form like dereferencing of a local, excep…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckpoisson or Zero Inflated Negative Binomial?
Post a Comment