Dear Statalist Users,
I am trying to figure out which method is more appropriate for my research: heckpoisson or a zero inflated negative binomial regression.
I am looking at the innovation output of startups measured as patent applications per year, depending on the type of parent company (all startups are spin-offs).
In my sample of 160 firms, 55 have not applied for any patents at all. Hence, a zero inflated negative binomial regression seems appropriate I guess.
However, one of the independent variables I wanted to look at is "Patent Overlap", a binary variable that equals 1 if the startup and its parent company have patents in the same field, 0 if not. This variable obviously equals 0 if a startup did not apply for any patents at all. One of my colleagues pointed out that because of this a sample selection bias is present and he recommended using a heckman model.
I am unsure what is the right choice here. Any advice?
(I am happy to attach a dataex if that helps)
Best wishes,
Tom
Related Posts with Heckpoisson or Zero Inflated Negative Binomial?
Regression results: omitted standard errors and other statisticsHi Everyone, I am trying to estimate the impact of a policy on an outcome that contains 17% zeros (…
Fixed effects in -xtpcse-Hello everyone, I'm running an analysis with TSCS data and test statistics reveal the presence of a…
Mixed Models - considering time in the interaction term (timepoint##intervention) as continuous or dummyDear Statlisters, I am analysing the data from an medical intervention in a pilot study with 29 ind…
Diff-in-diff and parallel trend assumptionThis question is not strictly related to Stata, I will remove if it is inappropriate. In a diff-in-…
RDD with categorical outcome variableI am just wondering if there is anyone out there able to perform rdrobust with categorical outcome v…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckpoisson or Zero Inflated Negative Binomial?
Post a Comment