Hey listers,
I am using the "xsmle" command to run fixed effects models on panel data. I am particularly interested in computing the indirect effects of my covarietes so I added the "effects" option. All my variables are in logarithms - dependent ln(x) and independent ln(y)-, but I'm not sure about the interpretation of the coefficients the "effects" option retrieves (LR Direct, Indirect and Total Effects).
For example, if LR Direct retrieves a coefficient of 0.312331. Should I go: a 1% change v1 is correlated with a 0.312331% change in y or a 31.2331% change in y.
Best regards,
Marcos
Related Posts with test - xsmle and interpretation
Accumulating results with two conditionsHello, I have data about the video game industry and I would like to add a control variable that re…
Lagging a variable 1 or more years from data on daily stock prices to use in OLS regressionI am trying to make an empirical study on the effect of dividend changes on future firm performance.…
Predictor variables became not significant in fixed effect model.Hi. I am using Stata 15.1 and here is sample of my data. My main predictor variables are winpowersh …
How to convert timing format MM:SS:MS into numeric?Hi. I have trouble converting a timing format in MM:SS:MS into a numeric? -For example converting it…
IVprobit with Cluster option and F testDear Statalist users, I have a panel dataset for 15 years and my dependent variable is binary in na…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to test - xsmle and interpretation
Post a Comment