Hey listers,
I am using the "xsmle" command to run fixed effects models on panel data. I am particularly interested in computing the indirect effects of my covarietes so I added the "effects" option. All my variables are in logarithms - dependent ln(x) and independent ln(y)-, but I'm not sure about the interpretation of the coefficients the "effects" option retrieves (LR Direct, Indirect and Total Effects).
For example, if LR Direct retrieves a coefficient of 0.312331. Should I go: a 1% change v1 is correlated with a 0.312331% change in y or a 31.2331% change in y.
Best regards,
Marcos
Related Posts with test - xsmle and interpretation
combining histograms of different bin sizes and plotting gamma distribution on themHi all I have prepared histograms (attached) of % trip by trip lengths in the UK for two modes of t…
Marginal effects of binary explanatory variable after craggitDear Statalist, Greetings! I was trying to estimate the drivers of farmers adoption decions. My dep…
Using and interpreting multi level mixed effects logictic regression with nested clusteringI have a dataset with around 30,000 participants, clustered into 20,000 families which are further c…
predicted probability issueDear community! I am struggling with a choice of command to calculate predicted probabilities of eac…
Creating categorical variables with multiple different conditions from continuous variablesHi, I am trying to create a categorical variable of "activity". I want 0=<150 mins of activity. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to test - xsmle and interpretation
Post a Comment