As the title says, I have a logistic regression model with a negative adjusted R2 (McFadden's), but my main predictor variable is statistically significant. This is true for the basic model that only includes x and y as well as for models that include multiple predictors.
Is it sound to conclude that x is associated with y even though my model does not fit according to the adjusted R2? Or does poor model fit mean that the statistically significant coefficients are not meaningful?
Thanks!
Related Posts with Logistic regression shows negative adj. (McFadden's) R2 but statistically sig. coefficient for main predictor variable. How to interpret?
Advices on how to learn systematically how to work with panelHi everyone, I have very elementary skills in econometrics and until now I've only worked with cros…
BootstrapHi everyone, I need some help with understanding why STATA doesn't let me use the command: bootstra…
Saving WTP estimates to conduct Poe TestDear all I have run a clogit model and have estimated wtp via wtp, krisnky command. I now want to s…
Formatting and managing dates, from String to MMYYYY formatDear All, I am a new user in Stata. I am having a basic question and would kindly ask for your help.…
xtivreg2 - identifying singleton observationsDear All, I have a panel dataset with 18,071 observations. I am estimating the following model in …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Logistic regression shows negative adj. (McFadden's) R2 but statistically sig. coefficient for main predictor variable. How to interpret?
Post a Comment