As the title says, I have a logistic regression model with a negative adjusted R2 (McFadden's), but my main predictor variable is statistically significant. This is true for the basic model that only includes x and y as well as for models that include multiple predictors.
Is it sound to conclude that x is associated with y even though my model does not fit according to the adjusted R2? Or does poor model fit mean that the statistically significant coefficients are not meaningful?
Thanks!
Related Posts with Logistic regression shows negative adj. (McFadden's) R2 but statistically sig. coefficient for main predictor variable. How to interpret?
Matching two samples by the same year/industry/provinceDear Stata experts, I have a sample of firms committed fraud. It has 1,700 observations. The format…
Time series techniiquesHi all, I try it again I have a dataset having as inputs: the id of products, quarters, Year corre…
Some queries about the latest sjlatexFellow Statalisters (especially StataCorp) I recently tried to update my version of sjlatex to the …
Truncate a number to two decimalsHi, I have a doubt. I have a variable named "score" (float) as showed below and I want to truncate i…
Standardization / z-transformation of matrixHi there, I want to standardize a large matrix (several 1000 rows and colums), so that it it has a m…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Logistic regression shows negative adj. (McFadden's) R2 but statistically sig. coefficient for main predictor variable. How to interpret?
Post a Comment