As the title says, I have a logistic regression model with a negative adjusted R2 (McFadden's), but my main predictor variable is statistically significant. This is true for the basic model that only includes x and y as well as for models that include multiple predictors.
Is it sound to conclude that x is associated with y even though my model does not fit according to the adjusted R2? Or does poor model fit mean that the statistically significant coefficients are not meaningful?
Thanks!
Related Posts with Logistic regression shows negative adj. (McFadden's) R2 but statistically sig. coefficient for main predictor variable. How to interpret?
Remove part of a Text in observationHi guys, Below is a sample of my data. I would like to remove the "-TOT RETURN IND" in all the obser…
Finding and plotting the trend of the weighted average of variable Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input double total_asse…
How to Run Random Forest for Time-Series DataHi, I am writing this post to ask whether there is any Stata command (or doing manually) to apply t…
Merge mulitple .csv filesI am using Stata 16.1 MP to merge six .csv files on neonatal, infant, and child mortality. I would l…
Main effect in logistic regression with interactionHello, I have a logistic regression model with interaction term (variable##sex). Variable is catego…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Logistic regression shows negative adj. (McFadden's) R2 but statistically sig. coefficient for main predictor variable. How to interpret?
Post a Comment