Dear All,
I have a more general question, that I would like to discuss with you:
In a pooled model I am using, I need to control for peer fixed effects. The challenge is now that every individual has their own peer -- noone has the same peer. Thus, peer fixed effects equal individual fixed effects. However, as I only have 170 individuals over 5 years in the model, including dummies per individual (i.hhid) results in collinearity problems. Using FE-estimation also does not make sense, as I am also interested in the isolated effects of time-invariant characteristics.
As I do not need to interpret these individual fixed effects (but control for them), I wonder whether I could also use the individual trend (hhid) instead. Would it make sense from an econometric perspective??
Any thought on that is highly appreciated!
Kerstin
Related Posts with Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
When I import csv.file, some variables are not recognizedWhen I import csv.file, some variables are not recognized (?) but appear in the first some cells lik…
Expanding DatasetHi everyone, I am trying to expand a dataset that looks like this: Dataset A contract_id region_…
Standard errors from margins commandsHi, I am wondering if someone can help me, as have been having some issues with plotting a figure t…
why the string variable was non-editable?As you can see from the picture, the contens are grey and non-editable, why? Array when I try to ex…
Stat SE 16 | How to obtain the result according to the picture?Good morning everybody. I'm beginner. I know how to use the basic commands of the software. But I wo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
Post a Comment