Dear All,
I have a more general question, that I would like to discuss with you:
In a pooled model I am using, I need to control for peer fixed effects. The challenge is now that every individual has their own peer -- noone has the same peer. Thus, peer fixed effects equal individual fixed effects. However, as I only have 170 individuals over 5 years in the model, including dummies per individual (i.hhid) results in collinearity problems. Using FE-estimation also does not make sense, as I am also interested in the isolated effects of time-invariant characteristics.
As I do not need to interpret these individual fixed effects (but control for them), I wonder whether I could also use the individual trend (hhid) instead. Would it make sense from an econometric perspective??
Any thought on that is highly appreciated!
Kerstin
Related Posts with Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
Identifying the Distribution of DataHi All, the COVID-19 epidemics proposed the need to estimate the distribtion of the serial interval…
Error: dta file corrupt. There was an I/O error. This suggests the problem is with the device rather than the file itself.Hi, I sometimes get the above error when opening a dataset. It is not very common, though common en…
Different colors on ascending and descending connect lines in scatter plotDear All, Is it possible to color connecting lines in a scatter plot in different colors ? I plott…
How to convert from Quarterly to Annual data set?Hi. I am facing problem in converting my quarterly bank level data to annual data. My data set is li…
HELP! confidence intervals for meta-analysis STATA v16I am trying to do a meta-analysis and calculated odds ratios and Upper and Lower 95% CI. On STATA v1…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
Post a Comment