Dear All,
I have a more general question, that I would like to discuss with you:
In a pooled model I am using, I need to control for peer fixed effects. The challenge is now that every individual has their own peer -- noone has the same peer. Thus, peer fixed effects equal individual fixed effects. However, as I only have 170 individuals over 5 years in the model, including dummies per individual (i.hhid) results in collinearity problems. Using FE-estimation also does not make sense, as I am also interested in the isolated effects of time-invariant characteristics.
As I do not need to interpret these individual fixed effects (but control for them), I wonder whether I could also use the individual trend (hhid) instead. Would it make sense from an econometric perspective??
Any thought on that is highly appreciated!
Kerstin
Related Posts with Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
question about didregressDear all, When I run the example code of didregress,I get very different result from Stata.com Diff…
Please help meHello everyone. I'm new in STATA and I need help for this problem. I have a Variable (Var1) which ha…
Stata 17 table helpHi, all. I am working with the updated -table- command in Stata 17, and am looking to produce a fair…
Question1. I am about running a regress in STATA including dummies. I have logged all variables in Excel but…
xtlogit: hybrid model by hand. How to obtain average marginal effects using mimrgnsHello everyone, for my current research, I employ a hybrid logit model for a binary outcome variabl…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
Post a Comment