Dear All,
I have a more general question, that I would like to discuss with you:
In a pooled model I am using, I need to control for peer fixed effects. The challenge is now that every individual has their own peer -- noone has the same peer. Thus, peer fixed effects equal individual fixed effects. However, as I only have 170 individuals over 5 years in the model, including dummies per individual (i.hhid) results in collinearity problems. Using FE-estimation also does not make sense, as I am also interested in the isolated effects of time-invariant characteristics.
As I do not need to interpret these individual fixed effects (but control for them), I wonder whether I could also use the individual trend (hhid) instead. Would it make sense from an econometric perspective??
Any thought on that is highly appreciated!
Kerstin
Related Posts with Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
Testing code blocks Code: This is a test with 10 spaces between here> <and here. …
Coding 1/0 between timestampsI am trying to code if a listing existed in a certain month between the start date of the listing an…
Superimposing Kaplan-Meier failure curves for 2 outcomesHi, I'm trying to superimpose Kaplan-Meier curves for two separate outcomes, and I'd like the flip …
ignore this! …
ignore this also! …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Individual trend instead of individual fixed effects?
Post a Comment