I have a staggered Difference-in-Differences setting as below when examining the impact of laws implemented in different countries in different time periods: Array
When running the regression with Y is firms' asset growth, the result is as below Array
As we can see from the Table, the coefficients of the Leniency Law variable decrease in magnitude and losing the significant levels as well.
My senior friend told me one way to deal with this problem is to ignore column (6), but adding a dummy variable called US_dummy for every specification from (1) to (5). US_dummy equalling to 1 if this firm is in the US.
However, when I run the regression, I faced the omitted problem, which is explained here
I am wondering why I need to control for US_dummy variable like that and how to overcome the omitted issue here.
My solution is instead of controlling for US_dummy, I may control for US_pt, which equals US_dummy*pt. I am wondering whether I am falling into any fallacy?
Related Posts with What we should do when the coefficients of variables of interest quite different from that of whole sample?
split (Chinese) addressDear All, I have this dataset. Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install datae…
Accumulate ifDear, good night! See if anyone can give me a tip. I consulted and I'm not finding topics on the sub…
Creating cumulative frequency time series (overlay panels)Hi all, I have a data set of clients (unique ID) with their week of immunization and age group. Wha…
Clarifying the triple diff definition in generalized DiD?Hi all, I am examining the triple diff (diff-in-diff-in-diff)(DDD) in a staggered setting. Normally…
Sum up # of observations and output to spreadsheet/csvHello, I am trying to accumulate the number of observations for each dataset with a pattern of "con…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to What we should do when the coefficients of variables of interest quite different from that of whole sample?
Post a Comment