I have a staggered Difference-in-Differences setting as below when examining the impact of laws implemented in different countries in different time periods: Array
When running the regression with Y is firms' asset growth, the result is as below Array
As we can see from the Table, the coefficients of the Leniency Law variable decrease in magnitude and losing the significant levels as well.
My senior friend told me one way to deal with this problem is to ignore column (6), but adding a dummy variable called US_dummy for every specification from (1) to (5). US_dummy equalling to 1 if this firm is in the US.
However, when I run the regression, I faced the omitted problem, which is explained here
I am wondering why I need to control for US_dummy variable like that and how to overcome the omitted issue here.
My solution is instead of controlling for US_dummy, I may control for US_pt, which equals US_dummy*pt. I am wondering whether I am falling into any fallacy?
Related Posts with What we should do when the coefficients of variables of interest quite different from that of whole sample?
split, parse(,) maximum number of variables reachedDear all, I'm using Stata 15 and trying to split a string variable into different component which ar…
Create a dummy variable that equals 1 if the compensation committee is comprised wholly of independent directorsHi everyone, I am new to the stata forum and I have some questions. To run my regression, I need som…
Outreg2 providing one-sided p-valuesDear Stata users, I have a question regarding the one-sided p-value in outreg2, which I use to expo…
Regression output - Bug?Hi everyone, I am trying to run some old code (version 14.2) using a new Stata version (15.1) on a …
Random dummy variable with restrictionsI have a panel dataset and want to create a random dummy variable with mean 0.2 that marks a random …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to What we should do when the coefficients of variables of interest quite different from that of whole sample?
Post a Comment