Dear Experts and Scholars
I would like to ask that I estimated the GMM estimator, which the number of instrument are increased higher than the number of group. Under this problem, I used "collapse" and the coefficient of each aggressors change from negative to positive sign. Vice versa. while the value of Hansen test was also lower than 0.1. In this case, how can i deal with these issues ? Many thanks in advance
Related Posts with Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
RE: Obtaining robust standard errors after xtnbreg with random effectsHello! I am using negative binomial regression with random effects: xtnbreg crime unemployment pove…
Panel DataHi, I am working with panel data and want to create a dummy variable based on the median of each cro…
how to use table command to analyze multiple choice question?hi masters, I just meet a problem which is somewhat frustrated. The survey question always contain…
Question about Rank AcrossGood morning, I have 3 variables that I need to rank. There are some cells in those variables that …
Parallel ado path errorDear all, I would like to use the ado parallel on a virtual machine (remote data access machine due …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Post a Comment