Dear Experts and Scholars
I would like to ask that I estimated the GMM estimator, which the number of instrument are increased higher than the number of group. Under this problem, I used "collapse" and the coefficient of each aggressors change from negative to positive sign. Vice versa. while the value of Hansen test was also lower than 0.1. In this case, how can i deal with these issues ? Many thanks in advance
Related Posts with Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Expression builder dialogIs there any way to make the expression builder dialog larger? The lists are too small to be usable …
Random Effect Autocorrelation TestDear Good People, I am currently shifting to using Random Effect for my data and I would like to kn…
How to display the P value of the mediation with khb command?Hi all, Recently I read a paper published in JAMA Pediatrics(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1212),…
Sample size estimation for comparison of three proportions: Control, Treatment1 and Treatment2Dear StataList, How can I calculate the sample size requirements for proportions in 3 (three) groups…
Average calculation issuesHi there, I would like to calculate the average account receivable using netaccountsreceivable and …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Post a Comment