Dear Experts and Scholars
I would like to ask that I estimated the GMM estimator, which the number of instrument are increased higher than the number of group. Under this problem, I used "collapse" and the coefficient of each aggressors change from negative to positive sign. Vice versa. while the value of Hansen test was also lower than 0.1. In this case, how can i deal with these issues ? Many thanks in advance
Related Posts with Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Control variables for firm sizeDear friends in the Stata forum, I am working with a (strongly balanced) panel data using DiD analy…
Choosing the right matching technique for conducting a diff in diff analysisHello everyone, I am struggling with my project and hope to get some advice on the best way to proc…
"Repeated time values within panel" error using xtset command (DiD analysis)Hi, I´m doing a generalized DiD analysis. After checking all assumptions, I wanted to start with the…
gen var basen on frequencies?How do i create a new variable based on known frequencies. Fx i have been send a list on frequencie…
how can I use warpreg.ado ?Dear Sir/Madam; I have a difficulty in using gwarpreg.ado at http://www.stata.com/stb/stb30/snp10/ …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Post a Comment