Dear Experts and Scholars
I would like to ask that I estimated the GMM estimator, which the number of instrument are increased higher than the number of group. Under this problem, I used "collapse" and the coefficient of each aggressors change from negative to positive sign. Vice versa. while the value of Hansen test was also lower than 0.1. In this case, how can i deal with these issues ? Many thanks in advance
Related Posts with Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Reshape long Datastream equity dataHi, I have the following type of wide panel data downloaded directly from Datastream. The stucture …
PPMLHDFE - Regression not startingDear Statalist forum, I am currently tring to run a gravity equation using the PPMLHDFE command and…
How to add extra column to summary statistics with asdoc?Dear all, I am using the asdoc tool to export my tables to word. However, I am struggling to add an…
egen numeric variableDear Stata users, Please take a look at this problem: I wish to generate a unique identifier for a …
How do I insert two weights in one tabulate command?Hi Statalist, I have a survey with two sample populations. One is representative of the general pop…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problems with using "collapse" and the coefficient become changes from negative to positive sign. Vice versa.
Post a Comment