Hello,
I have calculated the user-written command "inteff" after a logit regression to check my interaction term consisting of two continuous variables with values between 0 and 1. The usage of the "inteff" command is given, so I have to use it. Basically I understand the outputs from the "inteff" command, only in the case of the following figure I don't understand the statement. It irritates me, that the axis "Interaction Effect (percentage points)" has negative values in connection with a predominantly increasing "predicted probability". Can someone kindly help me how to interpret this figure?
I understand the illustration as follows: The interaction effect is negative. A negative interaction effect means that the closer the both continuous variables get to their maximum value of 1, the more negative the interaction effect becomes. For me, however, it only makes logical sense that a negative interaction effect is accompanied by a decreasing predicted probability.
Totally, I don't get it.
Array
Many thanks for your help.
Related Posts with Contradiction in the -inteff- outcome
Help needed for data cleaningHi, I am using Stata version 16 and need some help in a task. Below is an example of my dataset: …
How to move x-axis from y=-0.8 to y=0?Dear all, Now I plot a twoway graph.I want to move the x-axis to zero.Here is my codes and graph.I …
kdensity of plausible values in PIAAC data using -repest-Hello, I am working with OECD's PIAAC data, a survey of skills of people in OECD countries. The dat…
Generate a new variables, with the last two numbers of another variableHi there, In my databank, I have a variable that tells me about a departure time (the variable is n…
Boostrapping system of equationsHi, I am trying to bootstrap standard errors for a system of equations (its a 2SLS where I create th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Contradiction in the -inteff- outcome
Post a Comment