Hello,
I have calculated the user-written command "inteff" after a logit regression to check my interaction term consisting of two continuous variables with values between 0 and 1. The usage of the "inteff" command is given, so I have to use it. Basically I understand the outputs from the "inteff" command, only in the case of the following figure I don't understand the statement. It irritates me, that the axis "Interaction Effect (percentage points)" has negative values in connection with a predominantly increasing "predicted probability". Can someone kindly help me how to interpret this figure?
I understand the illustration as follows: The interaction effect is negative. A negative interaction effect means that the closer the both continuous variables get to their maximum value of 1, the more negative the interaction effect becomes. For me, however, it only makes logical sense that a negative interaction effect is accompanied by a decreasing predicted probability.
Totally, I don't get it.
Array
Many thanks for your help.
Related Posts with Contradiction in the -inteff- outcome
age at first childHello, I am looking at childless men in the UK and I am using panel data which has 9 waves. childles…
Rationale behind set seed/seedI have been coming across the "set seed" command while generating random numbers and while reporting…
Expand and Insert Observations to VariableHi all, Thanks in advance for any suggestions and supports! I am currently trying to expand a datas…
How to balance this datasetHi all I am having a hard time thinking about the best way to balance this dataset. The format is: …
Using gsem with multiply imputed dataI am trying to fit a gsem model using multiply imputed data with multiple continuous factor dependen…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Contradiction in the -inteff- outcome
Post a Comment