Hello everyone,
I have a question related to specifying max(#) using traj command in Stata.
I am analysing a dependent variable with values ranging from 1 to 9 using a censored normal specification. I wanted to seek your expert guidance on specifying the appropriate “min()” and “max()” values in the model. In particular, I would like to check if you would recommend us to specify:
(a) the theoretical minimum/maximum values of the variable (i.e. min(1) and max(9)); OR
(b) a wider range of values (i.e. min(0) max(10))?
I noticed that the estimates obtained by specifying max(9) vs max(10) are different, and results in different group membership probabilities; however, the estimates obtained by specifying other values for max such as max(10), max(20) or max(100) are similar.
If there are any guidelines you would recommend us to use when selecting the min/max values for the censored normal in the traj command, please advise.
Thank you.
Related Posts with Group-based Trajectory Analysis: max(#) in censored normal distribution
Stata added observations with very small or very large valuesStrange Stata issue. For unclear reasons, Stata recently added a number of observations with bizarr…
Set path to a link folderHello everyone, I am working on a project which takes several INPUT from several folders disseminat…
Counting number of specific observations per groupDear all, I have a simple problem for which I have not been able to find a solution. Imagine a very…
How to loop over quarters starting at third quarterHello, I am dealing with fixed width data in a .txt file that includes date. The data spans 1973 to…
graph: quantile regression coefficients - xtrifreg commandDear all, Can you help me with the code to create a graph of the quantile regression coefficients u…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Group-based Trajectory Analysis: max(#) in censored normal distribution
Post a Comment