Hi everyone,
I am conducting a mediation analysis using the ml_mediation command on Stata which by default is set to REML. I have the following set up:
ml_mediation, dv( AR ) mv( RD ) iv( CP ) l2id( ID ) cv( LaggedAR, Size, Profitability, Growth)
I have already conducted Wooldridge's test for autocorrelation on the 3 equations in my set up for mediation analysis:
MV= IV+ CV1+ CV2+CV3+CV4
DV=IV+ CV2+CV3+CV4
DV=IV+ MV+ CV2+CV3+CV4
Where DV= Dependent Variable
IV= Independent Variable
MV= Mediator Variable
CV= Control variable
Do I need to check for heteroscedasticity? If yes then how can I do so in Stata and will I do it for all 3 equations in my model?
Related Posts with Do I need to check for heteroscedasticity in mediation analysis?
Time and/or Spatial fixed SDM model estimationI am trying to make a research about determinants of local development with the SDM model. The theor…
GraphingDear Users, I used an online app to produce this graph. Possible to do the same using Stata?: Array …
Graphing change in the hazard ratios after stcox tvc() optionHi, I am using Cox proportional hazar model with time dependent variables, I want to graph how hazar…
no observation error (2000) after entering control variables.Hi, I'm working on mexico pension program and at primary steps, when I want to estimate impact of pr…
Advice on forming a dependent variableDear everyone, Hope you are doing well in these times! I have a slight concern. I am evaluating th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Do I need to check for heteroscedasticity in mediation analysis?
Post a Comment