Hi everyone,
I am conducting a mediation analysis using the ml_mediation command on Stata which by default is set to REML. I have the following set up:
ml_mediation, dv( AR ) mv( RD ) iv( CP ) l2id( ID ) cv( LaggedAR, Size, Profitability, Growth)
I have already conducted Wooldridge's test for autocorrelation on the 3 equations in my set up for mediation analysis:
MV= IV+ CV1+ CV2+CV3+CV4
DV=IV+ CV2+CV3+CV4
DV=IV+ MV+ CV2+CV3+CV4
Where DV= Dependent Variable
IV= Independent Variable
MV= Mediator Variable
CV= Control variable
Do I need to check for heteroscedasticity? If yes then how can I do so in Stata and will I do it for all 3 equations in my model?
Related Posts with Do I need to check for heteroscedasticity in mediation analysis?
Stata command: ScalarHey Guys, i am a master's degree student in finance. For my master thesis i model the value at risk…
Constant term P value is zeroIn my OLS regression. I am getting a p-value for constant is zero. what it signifies.i have heard it…
Inserting knot locations in stpm2 when degree of freedom is 1.Hi there, I am running a flexible parametric model with 2 knots (I know this is equivalent to weibu…
Westerlund error-correction-based panel cointegration testsDear all, I am trying to do panel cointegration test using xtwest command or using Westerlund(2007) …
Converting numeric values into timeHello! In my dataset, I have a column "time_out" which has numeric values such as 17.45 or 18.36 et…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Do I need to check for heteroscedasticity in mediation analysis?
Post a Comment