Some general advice sought from the Stata community.
Say I'm doing a Difference in Differences exercise on N states or regions but only 1 of those states has been subject to the treatment. The other N-1 have not.
Inference is problematic presumably when -- even though there may be many cluster (states here) -- only 1 of them is treated.
Is there a standard way (or ways) to deal with such circumstances? Thanks.
Related Posts with Clustering under few treated clusters
Merging multiple .tex files: How to sort the individual files?I am outputting a lot of tex tables as raw files and then merge them into one ordered tex document u…
Seeking advice on how to accurately calculate marginal effects after multivariate probit regressionDear statalist users, Hope you all are doing well. I used Stata/MP 14.0 to run a multivariate probi…
Variable labels lost due to reshapeHello, I have a dataset (first example below) that I reshape from wide to long. However I lost of th…
Pearson's Chi-Squared Test - Requesting help with tab2I am currently working on an extension for research that requires me to measure whether the allocati…
scatterplotI would like to do several scatterplots were I plot the correlation btw mortality and covid-cases an…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Clustering under few treated clusters
Post a Comment