Some general advice sought from the Stata community.
Say I'm doing a Difference in Differences exercise on N states or regions but only 1 of those states has been subject to the treatment. The other N-1 have not.
Inference is problematic presumably when -- even though there may be many cluster (states here) -- only 1 of them is treated.
Is there a standard way (or ways) to deal with such circumstances? Thanks.
Related Posts with Clustering under few treated clusters
Calculating stable ratios in given time period for given firms in panel data setHi, I have a panel data set containing choosen financial data for thousands of companies. Some compa…
Control for the second province without dropping any samplesI am trying to control for province-year fixed effect, but some areas belong to 2 provinces (they ar…
Add polynomial control variable to modelHello, consider a simple regression model: Code: regress test_score i.gender age However, upon ins…
The perpetual inventory method (PIM)Hi dear Statalists, Is there any specialist who can help me to translate this statement into Stata …
Extracting the first number from a variable nameHello, I have data that looks like the following Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. For more …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Clustering under few treated clusters
Post a Comment