Hi all,
I'm interested in using full information maximum likelihood estimation as a method for addressing missing data, but I'm little uncertain whether the multivariate normality assumption pertains to all the variables in the SEM or simply the variables with missing data. I assume it refers to all the variables, but I've seen the assumption described both ways. If someone could provide a little clarity it would be much appreciated.
thanks,
-Mike
Related Posts with FIML assumptions
Measuring dynamicsHello, I'm doing a relatively simple analysis for a large group of banks for years 2011-2020. In pa…
cleaning the dataset for diff and diff modelHi, I have the following unbalanced data. I want to clean my data to apply simple diff-in-diff model…
Filtering in StataI have been trying to look for Stata equivalent of this SPSS filter creation " USE ALL. COMPUTE filt…
Getting File Ready For Stata AnalysisGreetings Everyone! Dear All, I have Raw Form of data of more the 400 firms as shown below how can …
Clustering SEs in Panel IVFE regression eliminates significanceHello, I am studying country structural transformation by regressing log(manufacturing value added …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to FIML assumptions
Post a Comment